Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether there was a loan agreement between the Financial Creditor and the Corporate Debtor; (ii) Whether the Financial Creditor did not disburse any amount to the Corporate Debtor.
Issue (i): Whether there was a loan agreement between the Financial Creditor and the Corporate Debtor
Analysis: The Facility Agreement, the borrower details reflected in the petition record, the Corporate Debtor's replies to the recall notices, the request for restructuring, and the later reply admitting a loan facility collectively showed that the Corporate Debtor had availed a loan arrangement from the Financial Creditor. The balance sheet also reflected the Financial Creditor under term loans, supporting the existence of a lending relationship.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the Corporate Debtor and in favour of the Financial Creditor.
Issue (ii): Whether the Financial Creditor did not disburse any amount to the Corporate Debtor
Analysis: The correspondence seeking restructuring on account of inability to pay EMI, together with the loan records and the admitted payments made towards the loan account, was inconsistent with the plea that no disbursal had taken place. The materials on record established disbursement and consequent default, and the petition satisfied the threshold of debt and default under the Code.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the Corporate Debtor and in favour of the Financial Creditor.
Final Conclusion: The application under section 7 of the Code was admitted, moratorium was directed, and CIRP was set in motion against the Corporate Debtor.
Ratio Decidendi: Admissions in loan-related correspondence and supporting financial records can establish the existence of a financial debt and default for admission of a section 7 insolvency application, even where the debtor disputes disbursal later.