Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rejection of the petitioner's application for registration as an Insolvency Professional on the ground of absence of managerial experience was sustainable, and whether the matter required fresh consideration by the authority.
Analysis: The application for registration had been rejected because the petitioner was engaged in consultancy and valuation work and was not treated as having the requisite managerial experience. The governing regulations recognize eligibility of individuals with specified professional and management experience, and the authority was required to examine the nature of the petitioner's experience in the light of those criteria. The record also showed reliance on comparable experience material and on the petitioner's claim of having undergone the prescribed examination and pre-registration course. In these circumstances, the controversy called for reconsideration on a fuller factual and documentary basis rather than a final rejection on the existing material.
Conclusion: The rejection order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh decision on the petitioner's eligibility, after permitting additional documents and requiring a reasoned and speaking order.