Dismissal of Company Petition due to Lack of Proof of Debt and Service of Notice

The Company Petition (CP(IB) No. 52/9/AMR/2021) was dismissed. The Tribunal found that the Form-3 notice was validly served on the Corporate Debtor despite contentions otherwise. However, the Operational Creditor failed to sufficiently prove the debt, with discrepancies in ledger accounts and lack of admissible evidence beyond invoices leading to the application's dismissal. The argument that the debt fell below the threshold limit for IBC applicability was also considered in the decision to dismiss the petition.

---

---

Issues:
1. Whether Form-3 notice was duly served on the Corporate Debtor.
2. Whether the Operational Creditor could prove the debt and whether the same is acknowledged by the Corporate Debtor.

Analysis:

Point No. I:
The Corporate Debtor contested the service of Form-3 notice, claiming it was not served due to changes in management. However, the Operational Creditor argued that despite typographical errors in dates, the notice was served on time as evidenced by the track record. The Tribunal found that the notice was indeed served, considering the track record and the office location during the relevant period.

Point No. II:
The Operational Creditor filed the application based on invoices without purchase orders, not acknowledged by the Corporate Debtor. Discrepancies in ledger accounts regarding cash payments were highlighted. The burden of proof lay on the Operational Creditor, who failed to provide substantial evidence beyond invoices and unsupported ledger accounts. The Tribunal noted the lack of admissible documents supporting the claim amount, leading to the dismissal of the application. The argument regarding the debt being below the threshold limit for IBC applicability was also considered, further contributing to the dismissal.

Point No. III:
As a result of the analysis, the Company Petition was dismissed (CP(IB) No. 52/9/AMR/2021).

This detailed analysis of the judgment showcases the examination of issues related to the service of notice, debt proof, acknowledgment, burden of proof, and applicability of IBC threshold limits, leading to the ultimate dismissal of the Company Petition.

---