TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court dismisses challenge to refund rejection based on incorrect tobacco classification.</h1> <h3>RAVINDRA & COMPANY Versus UNION OF INDIA</h3> The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of a refund application by the Assistant Collector, Central Excise, Fatehgarh. The ... Writ jurisdiction - Refund - Limitation - Order refusing refund appealable under the statute The writ petition was filed against the rejection of a refund application by the Assistant Collector, Central Excise, Fatehgarh, citing Section 11(B) of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944. The petitioner's claim for refund was based on the classification of his tobacco as unmanufactured, which was upheld in seizure proceedings. However, the court held that the petitioner should have appealed the original classification order and that the claim for refund was not valid under Section 11(B). The writ petition was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
