Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether receipts from granting licences and examination-related content, setting and marking of examinations were taxable as royalty under the India-UK DTAA.
Analysis: Section 90(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 permits a non-resident to invoke treaty provisions where they are more beneficial. Under Article 13(3) of the India-UK DTAA, amounts constitute royalty only when paid for the use of, or the right to use, copyright or for information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific experience. The receipts in question were examined in light of the settled law that royalty arises only where the payer obtains a copyright right or similar exploitation right. Following the binding ruling of the Supreme Court in Engineering Analysis, the Tribunal held that the revenue could not establish that the receipts represented royalty income.
Conclusion: The receipts were not taxable as royalty and the addition was liable to be deleted, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a treaty definition of royalty is more beneficial, receipts are not taxable as royalty unless the payer acquires a right to use copyright or a comparable exploitable interest.