Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether the assessment order could be sustained when the vigilance report and material relied upon by the assessing authority were not furnished to the assessee; and (ii) whether the limitation issue required adjudication in view of the remand.
Issue (i): whether the assessment order could be sustained when the vigilance report and material relied upon by the assessing authority were not furnished to the assessee.
Analysis: The assessment was founded on the report of the Regional Vigilance and Enforcement Department. Where an order is based on such material, fairness requires that the assessee be supplied with the material and be given an opportunity to object before the assessment is finalised. Denial of the report deprived the assessee of a meaningful opportunity to meet the case against it and amounted to violation of natural justice. The cited Division Bench decisions were applied to hold that an assessment based on undisclosed vigilance material cannot stand.
Conclusion: The assessment order was unsustainable for non-supply of the vigilance report and was liable to be set aside in favour of the petitioner.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded on the ground of violation of natural justice, the assessment was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the assessing authority for fresh consideration after furnishing the relied-upon vigilance material. The limitation question was left open to be urged before the authority.
Ratio Decidendi: When an assessment is based on vigilance or enforcement material, that material must be furnished to the assessee before finalisation of the assessment, failing which the order is vitiated for breach of natural justice.