Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Assessee prevails in tax dispute with detailed judgment analyzing expenses and legal provisions</h1> The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions to delete the additions made by the AO. The judgment provided ... Nature of expenses - R&D expenses - expenses of capital nature with enduring benefits OR revenue expenses - HELD THAT:- On examination of the details, we find that these expenses are incurred during the normal course of business. The expenditure such as annual technology licence fee, technical support services, assistance in canvassing orders, marketing services which are calculated and paid on the basis of annual sales made by the assessee every year in accordance with the agreement entered between the parties cannot be treated as capital expenditure. AO misread the head 'R&D expenditure' which in fact was a manufacturing expenditure. On this issue, we are guided by the judgment of Travancore Sugar and Chemical Ltd. [1966 (9) TMI 44 - SUPREME COURT] wherein it was held that whenever an amount is paid based on a percentage of turnover or profit, it would have no relation to the capital value of the assessee. The facts in the instant case reveal that the payments have made for utilization of services on annual basis taking the turnover as baseline for computation and since no augmentation of the capital asset or transfer of technology or any right thereof accrued to the assessee, we hold that the expenditure ought to be treated as revenue in nature. Disallowance of Bad Debts - The payment has been made by the railways after deducting the late delivery charges, and other taxes and provision has been made in the books on account of deduction with regard to late deliveries. The said amount has already been passed through the profit & loss account of earlier respective financial years under the head of provisions for bad and doubtful debts and had been disallowed while computing the income of the assessee u/s. 28 of the Act and the assessee has claimed the said amount as deduction directly in the computation of income as the amount was added back directly in the computation of income only in earlier assessment years. The assessee has furnished complete details of deductions made by the railway from the sales bill giving invoice wise deductions and nature of deduction. It is also fact on record that an amount directly shown in the computation of income as transfer from provisions for doubtful debts as the amount has already been debited to the profit & loss of the earlier years which has been added back by the assessee while calculating the taxable income. The balance amount pertain to the deduction made by the railways on the invoices raised for the year. Hence, it can be held that the amounts have been duly accounted under sales in the books of accounts, the due provisions have been made and when the recovery from the contractor/supplier have been made and liquidated damages are levied for late deliveries, they cannot be treated as penal in nature. Hence, the appeal of the revenue on this ground is liable to be dismissed. Gift and Presents - details of expenses by the AO that expenses have been incurred on marriage and gifts of personal in nature - We find that the ld. CIT(A) has diligently worked out the details of the gifts and bills and confirmed an amount of Rs. 7,74,238/- out of the disallowance of Rs. 12,35,000/-. The relief given by the ld. CIT(A) was after due verification and corroboration. Hence, we decline to interfere with the order of the ld. CIT(A). Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Issues:1. Disallowance of R&D expenses2. Disallowance of bad debts claimed for late delivery charges deducted by Indian Railways3. Disallowance of expenses of personal natureAnalysis:Issue 1 - Disallowance of R&D expenses:The assessee claimed R&D expenditure as manufacturing expenses, which the AO treated as capital expenditure. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, and the tribunal upheld the decision. The expenses were incurred for technology license fee, marketing services, and technical services, not leading to capital asset augmentation. The tribunal relied on Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, holding the expenses as revenue in nature following the Travancore Sugar and Chemical Ltd. case.Issue 2 - Disallowance of bad debts for late delivery charges:The AO disallowed bad debts claimed by the assessee for late delivery charges deducted by Indian Railways. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, stating that the amounts were duly accounted for in the books, and provisions were made for doubtful debts. The tribunal found that the deductions were accounted for, and the recovery from suppliers was considered, leading to dismissal of the revenue's appeal.Issue 3 - Disallowance of personal expenses:The AO disallowed expenses on gifts and marriage, terming them as personal in nature. The CIT(A) partially confirmed the disallowance. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision after verifying the details of expenses, declining to interfere with the relief granted. Consequently, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed.In conclusion, the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions to delete the additions made by the AO. The judgment provided detailed analysis of each issue, considering the nature of expenses, provisions made, and relevant legal provisions to determine the tax treatment of the disputed amounts.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found