Petition allowed; registration reinstated after State failed to appeal; file pre-cancellation returns within 45 days with taxes, interest, fines

HC allowed the petition challenging cancellation of registration, finding the State failed to appeal and effectively accepted the earlier order. Petitioners may file outstanding returns for the pre-cancellation period within 45 days of receiving this order, and must pay the tax due, interest, and prescribed fines/fees for belated filing. The court noted interim events and that amnesty schemes were not availed by petitioners, imposed specified conditions in the order, and treated the State's inaction as waiver of limitation. Petition allowed subject to compliance with the conditions and payment obligations.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to cancellation of registrations under Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Failure to avail opportunities under Amnesty Schemes - Remedies under Section 30 and appeal before Appellate Authority - Delay in availing remedies - Judicial review of cancellation orders - Implementation of directions from previous judgment.

Analysis:
The judgment addresses the challenge posed by all writ petitioners against the cancellation of their registrations under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioners missed opportunities provided through Amnesty Schemes to restore their cancelled registrations. The Act offers two modes for revocation of cancellation: Section 30 remedy, which must be availed within thirty days from the cancellation order, and the appeal before the Appellate Authority, to be utilized within three months from the communication of the cancellation order. Most petitioners failed to utilize these remedies, except for a few who belatedly filed appeals accompanied by returns and admitted tax amounts.

One petitioner managed to avail the appellate remedy with a significant delay, while others approached the Court directly seeking restoration. A previous judgment considered similar cases and accepted the petitioners' arguments, imposing conditions for restoration. The State's delay in responding to a communication seeking guidance on the previous order was noted, with the Court interpreting it as an acceptance of the judgment. The State confirmed implementing the directions from the previous order for all petitioners, leading to the current judgment's directions being passed, effective immediately upon receipt.

The current judgment allows petitioners to file returns for the period before registration cancellation, pay defaulted taxes with interest and fines, and upon compliance, their registrations will be revived. The respondents are instructed to facilitate this process within forty-five days. The payment made for tax, penalty, etc., should not be adjusted from any unutilized Input Tax Credit. The respondents are directed to make necessary changes in the GST Web Portal to enable petitioners to file returns and make payments within the specified timeframe. Ultimately, the writ petitions are allowed with no costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

---