Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI • Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions • Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations • Issue-wise legal analysis • Practical arguments and supporting content • Professionally structured draft ready for further review.
Tribunal rules in favor of assessee, cancels late fees pre-01.06.2015 The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in seventeen appeals, setting aside the late fee imposed under section 234E for periods before 01.06.2015. ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal rules in favor of assessee, cancels late fees pre-01.06.2015
The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in seventeen appeals, setting aside the late fee imposed under section 234E for periods before 01.06.2015. Emphasizing the prospective application of the late fee provisions, the tribunal directed the authority to delete the late fees. The decision was based on the substantive nature of section 234E and the lack of legal authority to demand late fees for periods predating 01.06.2015.
Issues: Appeals against late fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act for assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16.
Analysis: The appeals were filed against the late fee imposed under section 234E of the Income Tax Act by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC-TDS, Ghaziabad. The primary issue revolved around the levy of late fees under section 234E. The tribunal noted that the amendment providing for the computation of late fees under section 234E came into effect only from 01.06.2015. Referring to the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court's decision in the case of Fatheraj Singhvi vs. Union of India, it was held that the provisions of section 234E are substantive and can only be levied prospectively from 01.06.2015. The tribunal emphasized that any demand for late fees under section 234E for periods before 01.06.2015 was without legal authority. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the impugned notices under section 200A related to the computation and intimation for payment of late fees under section 234E for periods prior to 01.06.2015.
The tribunal further highlighted that the decision was in line with the Coordinate Bench of Pune Tribunal's rulings in various cases. The Hon'ble Bombay High Court's decision on the constitutional validity of section 234E did not impact the retrospective operation of the provisions. Consequently, the tribunal directed the ACIT, CPC-TDS, Ghaziabad to delete the late fees levied under section 234E. As a result, the appeal filed by the assessee for the assessment year 2013-14 was allowed. The tribunal extended the same decision to the remaining sixteen appeals for assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16, allowing all seventeen appeals of the assessee.
In conclusion, the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in all seventeen appeals, setting aside the late fee imposed under section 234E for periods before 01.06.2015. The tribunal emphasized the prospective application of the late fee provisions under section 234E and directed the concerned authority to delete the late fees. The decision was based on the substantive nature of section 234E and the lack of legal authority to demand late fees for periods predating 01.06.2015.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.