Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>ITAT confirms revision order for AY 2013-14 due to assessment errors</h1> <h3>Gujarat Infrastructure Co. Versus Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Valsad</h3> The ITAT Surat confirmed the Ld. PCIT's order initiating revision proceedings under section 263 for AY 2013-14. The tribunal upheld the decision to set ... Revision u/s 263 by CIT - development expenses, unsecured loan and the advances unexplained - HELD THAT:- Assessee failed to furnish the required documentary evidences to substantiate the issues identified by ld. PCIT. We find that Ld. PCIT has given sufficient & adequate opportunities before passing his revisional assessment order. The assessee failed to provide without details of development expenses, unsecured loan and the advances despite repeated notice and reminder. We find that in absence of any details sought by PCIT, the order of Assessing Officer was revised by PCIT. Before us neither the representative have appeared despite service of notice nor filed any written submission. Therefore, in absence of any detailed requirement in support of various grounds of appeal raised by assessee, we do not find any reason to deviate from the finding of ld. PCIT. Accordingly, we confirm the order of PCIT that the assessment order is erroneous and in so far as prejudicial to the interest of revenue. In the result, the various grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are rejected. Issues:1. Revision proceedings under section 263 initiated by Ld. Pr. CIT2. Assessment order set aside invoking provisions of section 2633. Treatment of unrecorded land value under section 694. Claim of partner's remuneration deduction against 'on money'5. Disproportionately high development expenses without defects in booksIssue 1 - Revision proceedings under section 263:The appeal was against the order of Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax-Valsad dated 22.03.2018 under section 263 for AY 2013-14. The assessee challenged the initiation of revision proceedings by Ld. Pr. CIT, contending that the original assessment was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The Ld. PCIT identified issues related to unrecorded land value, partner's remuneration, and development expenses, leading to the initiation of revision proceedings.Issue 2 - Assessment order set aside under section 263:The Ld. PCIT set aside the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer, directing a fresh assessment after finding errors and prejudice to revenue. Despite the assessee's contentions, the Ld. PCIT held that the original assessment lacked complete inquiry on crucial issues, necessitating the revision under section 263.Issue 3 - Treatment of unrecorded land value under section 69:The Ld. PCIT found discrepancies in the valuation of land not recorded in the books, amounting to Rs.1,84,80,600. The failure of the Assessing Officer to treat this unrecorded value as an unexplained investment under section 69 rendered the assessment erroneous and prejudicial to revenue, leading to the revision proceedings.Issue 4 - Claim of partner's remuneration deduction:The Ld. PCIT questioned the deduction claimed by the appellant for partner's remuneration against 'on money' admitted during a survey. The discrepancy in the allowable remuneration amount highlighted a flaw in the original assessment, contributing to the revision under section 263.Issue 5 - Disproportionately high development expenses:The Ld. PCIT raised concerns about the high development expenses compared to land cost without defects in the books. Despite no invocation of section 145 by the Assessing Officer, the Ld. PCIT deemed the expenses disproportionately high, further justifying the revision under section 263.In the absence of detailed submissions and documents from the assessee, the ITAT Surat confirmed the order of Ld. PCIT, dismissing the appeal and upholding the revision under section 263. The tribunal found no reason to deviate from the Ld. PCIT's findings, emphasizing the importance of providing necessary details to substantiate claims during assessment and revision proceedings.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found