TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess could be computed on Paper Cess, and whether the refund claim was governed by Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and defeated by limitation or unjust enrichment.
Analysis: The Circular dated 07.01.2014 clarified that Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess are not to be calculated on cesses levied under Acts administered by departments other than the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, though collected by the Revenue authorities. Paper Cess being levied under a different enactment and not by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, was therefore outside the base for Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess. The refusal to refund was unsustainable because the amount had been paid under mistake and the principles applied to the refund claim could not be confined to Section 11B in the facts of the case. The evidence also showed that the incidence of the cess had not been passed on, so the bar of unjust enrichment did not apply.
Conclusion: Paper Cess was not includible in the computation of Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess, and the refund claim was not barred by Section 11B or unjust enrichment.
Final Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to refund with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Cesses levied under enactments administered by departments other than the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, are not part of the base for Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess, and refund of amounts paid under mistake in such circumstances cannot be denied on the ground of Section 11B or unjust enrichment when the incidence has not been passed on.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
