Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned reassessment and penalty proceedings based on web report mismatch could be sustained without furnishing the mismatch particulars and granting a meaningful opportunity of hearing in accordance with the departmental circular and principles of natural justice.
Analysis: The assessment was founded on alleged mismatch between Annexure-I and Annexure-II data drawn from the Department website, but no concrete particulars were furnished in the show cause notice or in the impugned order. The record showed that the dealer was not given the details necessary to meet the allegation, and the authority did not follow the procedure indicated in the Commissioner's Circular dated 24.02.2021, which required disclosure of mismatch particulars and observance of natural justice before finalising the assessment. In the absence of such particulars and effective hearing, the assessment was held to be procedurally defective.
Conclusion: The impugned assessment and consequential revision proceedings were set aside, and the matter was directed to be reconsidered after furnishing the mismatch details and affording personal hearing to the dealer.