Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rejects withdrawal of approved resolution plan, emphasizes binding nature of decisions under insolvency law.</h1> The National Company Law Tribunal rejected and disposed of the application for withdrawal of an approved resolution plan by a private limited company. The ... Withdrawal of the Resolution Plan approved - Rule 11 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 - HELD THAT:- It is noted that the applicant is a successful resolution applicant whose resolution plan was approved by the CoC and subsequently was approved by the Adjudicating Authority vide order dated 04.06.2020. However, the successful resolution applicant never implemented the said plan and has filed the present application seeking withdrawal of the said resolution plan approved by the Adjudicating Authority. Application rejected. Issues:Withdrawal of approved resolution plan under Rule 11 of NCLT Rules, 2016.Analysis:The case involved an application by a private limited company to withdraw a resolution plan approved by the National Company Law Tribunal. The applicant, engaged in various industries, submitted a resolution plan in response to a CIRP initiated against another company. The plan included financial proposals and a proposed infusion of funds. However, due to financial difficulties during the Covid-19 pandemic, the applicant sought to withdraw the approved plan.The respondent, the erstwhile resolution professional, objected to the withdrawal, citing the absence of provisions allowing for such actions post-approval. The respondent highlighted that the resolution plan had been approved by both the CoC and the Adjudicating Authority, emphasizing a Supreme Court ruling that disallowed withdrawal of plans post-approval.Upon hearing arguments from both parties, the Tribunal noted that the applicant, a successful resolution applicant, had not implemented the approved plan and sought withdrawal. The Tribunal referenced a Supreme Court ruling that stated once a resolution plan is submitted and approved, it is binding and irrevocable between the CoC and the successful resolution applicant. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected and disposed of the application for withdrawal, emphasizing the binding nature of approved resolution plans under the insolvency framework in India.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
