Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant made out a case for regular bail under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 by satisfying the statutory twin conditions, namely reasonable grounds to believe that he was not guilty of the offence and was not likely to commit an offence while on bail.
Analysis: The allegation rested on alleged transfers by the company to several entities and the forensic audit material, but the Court found no prima facie material linking the alleged proceeds of crime to criminal activity relating to the scheduled offence in a manner sufficient to satisfy Section 45 of the Act. The record did not show that the applicant controlled the concerned accounts or operated the alleged firms, and the prosecution itself conceded that there was presently nothing on record to establish that the property was derived or obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of criminal activity relating to the scheduled offence. The Court held that mere unaccounted or suspicious transactions, without foundational material connecting them to the scheduled offence and the requisite knowledge or control, do not by themselves establish money laundering for bail purposes.
Conclusion: The applicant satisfied the twin conditions for bail and was held entitled to be released on bail.