Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal initiates CIRP against Panoramic Holidays Limited, appoints Interim Resolution Professional. Moratorium imposed.</h1> <h3>Ruptub Solutions Private Limited Versus Panoramic Holidays Limited</h3> The Tribunal admitted the petition filed by Ruptub Solutions Private Limited, initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Panoramic ... Maintainability of application - initiation of CIRP - Corporate Debtor failed to make repayment of its dues - Operational Creditors - existence of debt and dispute or not - HELD THAT:- The defense raised by the Corporate Debtor is moonshine defense in response to the Demand Notice dated 04.07.2019 to shy away from the liability - this Bench is of the considered opinion that there is no dispute regarding the fact that Corporate Debtor owes money to the Financial Creditor - The Corporate Debtor while replying to the demand notice has not brought to light any pre-existing dispute as required under the Code. The application made by the Operational Creditor is complete in all respects as required by law. It clearly shows that the Corporate Debtor is in default of a debt due and payable, and the default is in excess of minimum amount stipulated under section 4(1) of the IBC. Therefore, the default stands established and there is no reason to deny the admission of the Petition. In view of this, this Adjudicating Authority admits this Petition and orders initiation of CIRP against the Corporate Debtor. Petition admitted - Moratorium declared. Issues Involved:1. Jurisdiction and Admissibility of the Petition.2. Existence of Operational Debt and Default.3. Pre-existing Dispute.4. Admission of the Petition and Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).5. Moratorium and Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP).Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Jurisdiction and Admissibility of the Petition:The petition was filed by Ruptub Solutions Private Limited under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, seeking initiation of CIRP against Panoramic Holidays Limited. The Respondent is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, with its registered office in Mumbai, thus falling within the jurisdiction of the Mumbai Bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).2. Existence of Operational Debt and Default:The Petitioner raised invoices for services provided to the Respondent, who defaulted on payments starting from 12.12.2017. Despite repeated reminders and assurances from the Respondent, the default continued. The outstanding amount as of 01.09.2019 was INR 57,02,494.33 along with interest at 18%. The Respondent acknowledged its liability in various correspondences, including emails dated 01.03.2018 and 03.05.2018. The Petitioner issued multiple demand notices, but the Respondent failed to clear the dues within the statutory period.3. Pre-existing Dispute:The Respondent's reply dated 15.07.2019 denied any liability, which contradicted its earlier admissions. The Tribunal noted that any dispute must pre-exist before the issuance of the demand notice, as per the Supreme Court's ruling in 'Mobilox Innovations Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Kirusa Software (P) Limited.' Since the Respondent did not raise any dispute before the demand notice, the Tribunal concluded that no genuine dispute existed.4. Admission of the Petition and Initiation of CIRP:The Tribunal found the petition complete in all respects, showing that the Corporate Debtor was in default of a debt exceeding the minimum threshold under Section 4(1) of the IBC. The Tribunal admitted the petition and ordered the initiation of CIRP against the Corporate Debtor.5. Moratorium and Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP):Upon admission of the petition, a moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC was declared, prohibiting:- Institution or continuation of suits or proceedings against the Corporate Debtor.- Transfer or disposal of the Corporate Debtor's assets.- Foreclosure or enforcement of security interests.- Recovery of property occupied by the Corporate Debtor.The Tribunal appointed Mrs. Rashmi Pushpak Gangwal as the IRP to carry out the functions under IBC. The management of the Corporate Debtor was vested in the IRP, and the Operational Creditor was directed to deposit INR 3,00,000 with the IRP for expenses related to public notice and claims. The Registry was instructed to communicate the order to relevant parties and update the Corporate Debtor's Master Data.Conclusion:The Tribunal admitted the petition filed by Ruptub Solutions Private Limited, initiating CIRP against Panoramic Holidays Limited, and imposed a moratorium while appointing an IRP to manage the process. The decision was based on the established default and absence of any pre-existing dispute.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found