Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Appeal granted for tax assessment, stressing procedural fairness and substantial justice.</h1> The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and substantial justice in tax assessments. ... Unexplained cash deposited in bank account - assessee has filed an application for additional evidence containing copy of confirmation of the debtors along with their PAN cards - whether the cash deposits are out of recovery of advance given/outstanding amount/accumulated cash balance etc. or not. ? - HELD THAT:- The assessee in her application for admitting the additional evidence has submitted that evidence could not be furnished before the Ld. CIT(A) on same were collected after the proceeding before the Ld. CIT(A) and therefore same may be admitted. Though the confirmation from the debtors have been collected subsequent to the order of Ld. CIT(A) but same are crucial to the determination of issue-in-dispute whether the cash deposits are out of debtors realized in the year under consideration. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and interest of the substantial justice, we admit the additional evidence in the form of confirmations of the debtors and their PAN cards filed as additional evidence in terms of Rule 29 of the ITAT Rules, 1963. The order of the CIT(A) on the issue-in-dispute is accordingly set aside and matter is restored back to the Ld. CIT(A) for deciding afresh, in the light of the additional evidence filed by the assessee. It is needless to mention that both the assessee and Assessing Officer shall be afforded adequate opportunity of being heard. The grounds raised by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes. Issues:1. Natural Justice2. Unexplained Investment u/s. 69 [Rs. 14,98,995/-]Issue 1: Natural Justice:The appeal was filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-53, Mumbai, for assessment year 2014-15, raising concerns regarding the breach of natural justice. The grounds included the lack of proper opportunity for the appellant to be heard and the passing of the order without due consideration of facts and submissions. The appellate order was challenged as being bad and illegal due to these reasons. The issue of natural justice was a significant point of contention in this case.Issue 2: Unexplained Investment u/s. 69 [Rs. 14,98,995/-]:The primary issue under consideration was the confirmation of the addition made by the Assessing Officer under section 69 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding unexplained cash deposits in the bank account of the assessee. The Ld. CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, citing lack of cooperation and failure to provide necessary details. The appellant claimed that the cash deposits were explained as part of the cash balance, amounts collected from debtors, and refunds of advances. However, the Assessing Officer treated the cash deposit as unexplained due to the absence of proper documentation and cooperation. The appellate proceedings revealed discrepancies in the details provided by the assessee, leading to the sustained addition of Rs. 14,98,995/-. The issue revolved around the source of the cash deposits and the adequacy of explanations provided by the assessee.In a detailed analysis, the Tribunal considered the submissions of both parties and admitted additional evidence in the form of confirmations of debtors and their PAN cards, crucial to determining whether the cash deposits were from debtors realized during the relevant year. The order of the Ld. CIT(A) was set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration based on the additional evidence. The decision emphasized the importance of substantial justice and fairness in the proceedings, ensuring that both the assessee and the Assessing Officer would have adequate opportunities to present their case. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, highlighting the significance of proper evidence and adherence to procedural fairness in tax assessments.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found