Non-woven bags from polypropylene granules classified as plastic articles under Heading 3923, not textile bags under Heading 6305

The AAAR Gujarat held that non-woven bags manufactured from polypropylene granules are classifiable under Heading 3923 as plastic articles, not under Heading 6305 as textile bags. The Authority determined that polypropylene, being a plastic material capable of polymerization, cannot be construed as textile fabric. The decision relied on precedent establishing that materials made from polypropylene merit classification as plastic articles under Chapter 39, distinguishing cases involving cotton and woolen materials which qualify as textiles. The bags were therefore classified as plastic articles under HSN Heading 3923.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Classification of Non-woven Bags under appropriate Heading.
2. Eligibility for exemption under Notification No.01/2017-CT(Rate) and 01/2017-IT(Rate).

Issue-wise Analysis:

1. Classification of Non-woven Bags:

The appellant, engaged in manufacturing Non-Woven Bags from Non-Woven fabrics, sought to classify these bags under Heading 6305.3300, arguing that polypropylene non-woven fabrics are textiles, not plastics. They cited various authoritative clarifications and judicial precedents to support their claim, including a Supreme Court judgment in Porritts and Spencers (Asia) Ltd V/s State of Haryana.

The Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (GAAR) disagreed, classifying the bags under HS code 3923, based on the Madhya Pradesh High Court judgment in M/s Raj Packwell Ltd, which stated that polypropylene granules cannot be considered textiles under the Textiles Committee Act, 1963. GAAR also relied on CBIC Circular No. 80/54/2018-GST, classifying polypropylene woven and non-woven bags under Chapter Heading 3923.

The appellant contended that GAAR erred in its reliance on the Madhya Pradesh High Court judgment, as it pertained to woven bags, not non-woven bags, and ignored authoritative clarifications and judicial precedents supporting their classification under Heading 6305.3300. They also argued that GAAR misinterpreted the binding nature of Advance Ruling Authority decisions under Section 103 of the CGST Act.

The appellate authority upheld GAAR's ruling, emphasizing the applicability of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and the Harmonized System of Nomenclature (HSN) for classification under GST. It noted that the TRU Circular dated 31.12.2018 clarified that polypropylene woven and non-woven bags are classifiable under HS code 3923, and this classification was binding. The authority dismissed the appellant's reliance on the Supreme Court judgment in Porritts and Spencers, as the case involved textiles made from cotton and wool, not polypropylene.

2. Eligibility for Exemption:

The appellant sought exemption for Non-woven Bags under Notification No.01/2017-CT(Rate) and 01/2017-IT(Rate). GAAR ruled against this, stating that the bags did not qualify for exemption under the specified notifications.

The appellate authority upheld GAAR's decision, noting that the classification of the bags under HS code 3923 rendered them ineligible for the claimed exemptions.

Conclusion:

The appellate authority rejected the appeal, affirming GAAR's classification of Non-woven Bags under HS code 3923 and denying the exemption under Notification No.01/2017-CT(Rate) and 01/2017-IT(Rate). The authority emphasized the binding nature of the TRU Circular and the inapplicability of the Supreme Court judgment in Porritts and Spencers to the present case.

---