Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tax authorities must follow Section 73 procedures before issuing garnishee notices under JGST Act</h1> <h3>M/s. Unity Infraprojects Ltd. Versus The State of Jharkhand through the Commissioner of State Taxes, Ranchi, The State Tax Officer, Urban Circle, Dhanbad</h3> M/s. Unity Infraprojects Ltd. Versus The State of Jharkhand through the Commissioner of State Taxes, Ranchi, The State Tax Officer, Urban Circle, Dhanbad ... Issues Involved:1. Issuance of Show Cause Notice under Section 73(1) of the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.2. Validity of the Order dated 01-11-2021 and related documents.3. Compliance with principles of natural justice.4. Legality of Garnishee Notice under Section 79(1)(c) of the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.5. Proper procedure for adjudication under the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Issuance of Show Cause Notice under Section 73(1) of the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017:The petitioner argued that the service of a Show Cause Notice under Section 73(1) is a condition precedent for issuing any order under Section 73(9) or other provisions of the Act. The petitioner claimed that no such notice was issued, which vitiates the entire proceedings. The court found that no proper show cause notice was issued apart from the summary of the show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01. This failure to issue a proper show cause notice was a significant procedural lapse.2. Validity of the Order dated 01-11-2021 and related documents:The petitioner sought to quash the Order dated 01-11-2021, the Summary of Order dated 01-11-2021, and the Garnishee Order dated 25-02-2022, arguing that these were void ab initio due to the absence of a mandatory Show Cause Notice. The court agreed, noting that the adjudication order and related documents were issued without following the due procedure prescribed under Section 73, rendering them null and void.3. Compliance with principles of natural justice:The petitioner contended that the adjudication order was issued without compliance with the principles of natural justice, as no proper show cause notice was given, preventing the petitioner from taking a proper defense. The court concurred, emphasizing that the absence of a proper show cause notice violated the principles of natural justice and the prescribed procedure under the JGST Act.4. Legality of Garnishee Notice under Section 79(1)(c) of the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017:The petitioner argued that the Garnishee Notice issued to Punjab National Bank for the recovery of Rs.3,84,02,528/- was illegal and without authority. The court found that the garnishee notice was issued based on an invalid adjudication order, thereby rendering it illegal.5. Proper procedure for adjudication under the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017:The court noted that the adjudication order was passed without following the due procedure prescribed under Section 73 read with Section 75(4) & (5) of the JGST Act. The court highlighted that the petitioner was not given an opportunity to submit a proper reply to the show cause notice, which vitiated the adjudication proceedings.Conclusion:The court quashed the summary of the show cause notice, the adjudication order dated 1st November 2021, the summary of the order and demand notice contained in GST DRC-07 dated 01.11.2021, and the Garnishee notice dated 25.02.2022. The matter was remanded to the State Tax Officer, Dhanbad, to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with the law after issuing a proper show cause notice under Section 73(1) of the JGST Act. The court made it clear that no comments were made on the merits of the case. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found