Tribunal remands case for further examination on Assessee's relationship with Allana Group.

The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for further examination due to the complexity of the relationship between the Assessee and the Allana Group. The Assessee's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with instructions for both parties to cooperate in the process. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of correctly determining turnover and net profit in this case involving the classification of the Assessee as a kachha arahtia based on Circular No. 452/1986 of CBDT.

---

---

Issues:
1. Determination of turnover and net profit for the assessee engaged in the business of dealing in fresh meat.
2. Rejection of books of accounts by the Assessing Officer and estimation of net profit at 2% on total turnover.
3. Interpretation of the relationship between the assessee and the Allana Group as either kachha arahtias or pacca arahtias.
4. Applicability of Circular No. 452/1986 of CBDT in determining the turnover for the purpose of section 44AB.

Analysis:

1. The appeal was filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) regarding the determination of turnover and net profit. The Assessee contended that the turnover should be considered as commission income, not the total live stock purchased. The Assessee argued that he acted as an agent of the exporter and not as a principal, therefore, the turnover should reflect the commission received.

2. The Assessing Officer rejected the books of accounts due to the inability of the Assessee to provide details of cash purchases. Consequently, the AO estimated the net profit at 2% of the total turnover. The Ld. CIT(A) upheld this decision, emphasizing that the Assessee's involvement in negotiating with various parties justified the rejection of books of accounts and the estimation of net profit at 2%.

3. The crux of the matter revolved around determining whether the Assessee should be classified as kachha arahtias or pacca arahtias. The Circular No. 452/1986 of CBDT provided guidance on this distinction. The circular highlighted that kachha arahtias' turnover only includes gross commission, while pacca arahtias' turnover comprises total sales/turnover. The relationship between the Assessee and the Allana Group needed to be examined to ascertain the nature of their association.

4. The Circular was relied upon in previous judgments to determine the classification of the Assessee. It was observed that the fee received by the Assessee could not be equated to turnover directly. The Circular's guidelines were crucial in categorizing the Assessee as a kachha arahtia, thereby impacting the determination of turnover for the purpose of section 44AB.

In conclusion, considering the complexity of the relationship between the Assessee and the Allana Group and the significance of correctly determining turnover and net profit, the Tribunal decided to remand the matter back to the AO for further examination. Both parties were instructed to cooperate, and the appeal of the Assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.

---