Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 271C for non-deduction of tax at source on payment of External Development Charges to the Haryana development authority was sustainable.
Analysis: The payment was made towards External Development Charges for development works undertaken for the State Government through the development authority. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision on identical facts and the coordinate Bench view that such payments, being in substance payments to the Government for development works, did not attract the TDS obligation invoked in the penalty proceedings. In the absence of a default under the TDS provisions, the foundation for penalty under section 271C failed.
Conclusion: The penalty was not sustainable and was directed to be deleted, in favour of the assessee.