Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        2022 (7) TMI 573 - AT - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Upholds Duty Demand, Penalty Imposed The Tribunal upheld the demand for short-paid duty, appropriation of the already paid amount, recovery of interest, imposition of penalty, and invocation ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal Upholds Duty Demand, Penalty Imposed

                            The Tribunal upheld the demand for short-paid duty, appropriation of the already paid amount, recovery of interest, imposition of penalty, and invocation of the extended period for demand under the Central Excise Act. The appellants' appeal was dismissed based on established legal principles and precedents, emphasizing compliance with the law.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Demand of Central Excise duty short paid.
                            2. Appropriation of already paid amount against the confirmed demand.
                            3. Recovery of interest on short paid Central Excise duty.
                            4. Imposition of penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
                            5. Invocation of extended period for demand.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Demand of Central Excise duty short paid:
                            The appellants, manufacturers of excisable goods, cleared certain inputs declaring lesser assessable value, resulting in short payment of duty compared to the cenvat credit availed. As per Rule 3(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, the appellants were required to pay an amount equal to the credit availed on such inputs. The short payment was pointed out during an audit, and the appellants subsequently reversed the short-paid amount for the period 2006-07. However, they continued the same practice for subsequent years. The Additional Commissioner confirmed the demand of Rs. 25,82,527 under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, which was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals).

                            2. Appropriation of already paid amount against the confirmed demand:
                            The amount of Rs. 25,82,527 already paid by the appellants was appropriated against the confirmed demand. This appropriation was not contested by the appellants, and it was a straightforward adjustment of the amount already reversed by them against the short payment identified.

                            3. Recovery of interest on short paid Central Excise duty:
                            The appellants argued that since they had correctly availed the cenvat credit and always maintained a sufficient balance in their cenvat account, no interest was payable. However, the Tribunal held that the short payment of duty at the time of clearance of inputs necessitated the payment of interest. The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's decisions in International Auto Ltd. and Steel Authority of India Ltd., which established that interest is leviable on delayed or deferred payment of duty for whatever reasons, including short payment at the time of clearance of goods.

                            4. Imposition of penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944:
                            The appellants contended that there was no suppression or intention to evade duty, and the short reversal of cenvat credit was unintentional. However, the Tribunal found that the appellants continued the practice of short payment even after being made aware of the default in 2008, indicating willful intent. The Tribunal upheld the imposition of a penalty equal to the duty demanded under Section 11AC, referencing the Supreme Court's decision in Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills, which clarified that penalty under Section 11AC is for deliberate deception with the intent to evade duty.

                            5. Invocation of extended period for demand:
                            The Tribunal noted that the appellants were made aware of their default in 2008 but continued the practice of short payment. This demonstrated a willful intention to not comply with Rule 3(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, justifying the invocation of the extended period for demand. The Tribunal upheld the use of the extended period, referencing the Supreme Court's decision in Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills, which linked the conditions for extending the limitation period with the imposition of penalty under Section 11AC.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the demand for short-paid duty, appropriation of the already paid amount, recovery of interest, imposition of penalty, and invocation of the extended period for demand. The Tribunal's decision was based on established legal principles and precedents, ensuring compliance with the Central Excise Act and Cenvat Credit Rules.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found