Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>Winding up of Saradha Griha Developers Pvt. Ltd. due to non-compliance and lack of assets</h1> The Tribunal ordered the winding up and subsequent dissolution of Saradha Griha Developers Pvt. Ltd. due to its failure to comply with statutory ... Seeking winding up the Respondent Company - Section 271 (c), (d) and 272(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 - HELD THAT:- The Respondent Company in Liquidation incorporated on 24.01.2011 does not have any commercial operation after 2012. The last Balance Sheet was filed on 31-03-2012 and thereafter there was no operation and the company has not filed any Balance Sheet. Paid up share capital of the Respondent Company in liquidation was only Rs. 1,00,000.00 and the Balance Sheet filed as on 31.03.2012 suggests that there is a loss of Rs. 9,726.00. Practically the company was in operation only for a year or so and there is no asset to liquidate belonging to the company. The liquidation value of the company is NIL. The Official Liquidator has sent winding up order to the Company but the letter was returned undelivered with a postal remark β€œLeft”. His representative had also visited the Registered Office of the Company at Paltan Bazar, Guwahati for physical verification and taking possession of the assets of the company. But, it was found that the company had closed the office long back. Hence, he could not find anything in the office. There is no realizable value of the Respondent Company in Liquidation to recover. There would be no useful purpose to continue with the process of liquidation of the Respondent Company in Liquidation under the provisions of Companies Act, 2013. No one has come forward against the winding up of the Company. Hence, the process under the provisions of Section 302(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 is deemed to have been completed and thus it is just, proper and reasonable in the circumstances of the case for the Tribunal to dissolve the company. The Tribunal in exercise of powers conferred under Sub Section (2) of Section 302 of the Companies Act, 2013, the Company in Liquidation i.e., β€œM/s. Saradha Griha Developers Private Limited” is ordered to be dissolved with effect from the date of this Order i.e. 21.06.2022 - Application allowed. Issues Involved:1. Winding up of the Respondent Company under Section 271(c) and (d) of the Companies Act, 2013.2. Appointment and actions of the Official Liquidator.3. Dissolution of the Respondent Company under Section 302(2) of the Companies Act, 2013.Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:1. Winding up of the Respondent Company under Section 271(c) and (d) of the Companies Act, 2013:The Tribunal considered the petition filed by the ROC, Guwahati, seeking the winding up of Saradha Griha Developers Pvt. Ltd. under Section 271(c) and (d) of the Companies Act, 2013. The petition was supported by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs and the Regional Director, North Eastern Region. The Tribunal noted that the company had defaulted in filing its financial statements and annual returns for the preceding five consecutive financial years and had not filed its Income Tax return since 31st March 2012. Additionally, the company was not functioning for more than five subsequent financial years, and the affairs of the other group companies were reportedly carried out fraudulently as per the SFIO report. The Tribunal observed that the company did not respond to the intimation of default sent by the Registrar of Companies and that notices sent to the company were returned unserved. Given these circumstances, the Tribunal concluded that the company had conducted its affairs fraudulently and had defaulted in statutory filings, making it proper to wind up the company in the interest of justice.2. Appointment and actions of the Official Liquidator:The Tribunal appointed the Official Liquidator attached to the Hon'ble High Court, Guwahati, as the Liquidator for winding up the company. The Liquidator was directed to take possession of the assets and properties of the company and submit progress reports every quarter. The Liquidator reported that the company had no commercial operations after 2012, and its last Balance Sheet filed on 31.03.2012 showed minimal assets and liabilities. The Liquidator's attempts to locate any assets or obtain cooperation from the company's directors were unsuccessful. The registered office of the company was found closed, and no assets were found during physical verification. Letters sent to the Chief Secretaries of West Bengal and Assam and the Financial Intelligence Unit for asset information yielded no results. The Liquidator also confirmed that the company had not taken any public deposits or loans from banks or financial institutions and had no charges registered against it.3. Dissolution of the Respondent Company under Section 302(2) of the Companies Act, 2013:Considering the Liquidator's report and the lack of any realizable assets or cooperation from the company's directors, the Tribunal deemed it just and reasonable to dissolve the company. The Tribunal observed that the company was not involved in any business activities affecting public interest and that continuing the liquidation process would serve no useful purpose. Consequently, the Tribunal exercised its powers under Section 302(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, and ordered the dissolution of Saradha Griha Developers Pvt. Ltd. effective from the date of the order, 21.06.2022. The Registry was directed to forward a copy of the order to the Registrar of Companies, NER, Guwahati, to record the dissolution in the company's register.Conclusion:The Tribunal ordered the winding up and subsequent dissolution of Saradha Griha Developers Pvt. Ltd. due to its failure to comply with statutory requirements, lack of commercial operations, and absence of realizable assets. The Official Liquidator's efforts to locate assets and obtain cooperation from the company's directors were unsuccessful, leading to the conclusion that dissolving the company was in the best interest of justice and efficiency.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found