1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court Upholds Enhanced Bail Amount, Emphasizes Swift Trial</h1> The High Court rejected the petition seeking a reduction in bail amount, upholding the previously enhanced bail set at Rs. 20,00,000. The court emphasized ... Prosecution - Bail amount - Customs Recovery of contraband - Accused released on bail Issues:1. Bail amount enhancement and reduction2. Timely disposal of the case and delay in proceedingsAnalysis:1. The judgment pertains to a case where the petitioner was arrested in connection with a contraband-related incident. Initially, the petitioner was granted bail of Rs. 3,00,000/-, which was later enhanced to Rs. 20,00,000/- by the High Court. The Supreme Court upheld the bail amount. Subsequently, a plea for reduction of bail amount was rejected by the same Single Judge who had initially enhanced it. The petitioner then approached the High Court again seeking a reduction in the bail amount. The court held that due to the previous decisions on the bail amount, no relief could be granted to the petitioner. The petition was dismissed on this ground.2. Apart from the bail amount issue, the court also addressed the timely disposal of the case. The court had directed that the case should be concluded within six months, and the complaint was filed accordingly. However, there were delays in the proceedings, with the charge being framed after several hearings. The department's counsel argued that the petitioner had caused delays in the proceedings, while the petitioner's counsel cited health issues as a reason for the delays. The court noted that the trial could be concluded within a short duration as most witnesses had been examined. The petitioner's argument that remaining in custody might lead to pleading guilty was dismissed by the court. Ultimately, the court emphasized the need for expeditious proceedings in the criminal case before the Magistrate.In conclusion, the petition seeking a reduction in the bail amount was rejected by the High Court. The court emphasized the importance of expeditious proceedings in the criminal case and directed the Magistrate to proceed further promptly as previously instructed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
