Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether assessments based on third-party mismatch data and allied material could be sustained without furnishing the relied upon particulars, issuing an effective notice, and affording a proper hearing including cross-examination where warranted.
Analysis: The assessments were founded on mismatch between the petitioner's returns and third-party data obtained from departmental sources and check-post records. The relied upon material had been referred to in the pre-assessment notices, but the petitioner's request for particulars was not met. The circular issued by the commercial taxes administration set out a procedure for mismatch cases, requiring verification of departmental data, issue of notice with all connected materials, opportunity to object, personal hearing, and, where appropriate, cross-examination. That procedure reflected the requirement that assessments on mismatch data must be preceded by meaningful opportunity and adherence to natural justice.
Conclusion: The impugned assessments could not be sustained and were set aside.
Final Conclusion: The writ petitions succeeded and the petitioner was entitled to fresh proceedings in accordance with the prescribed mismatch procedure and fair hearing requirements.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment based on third-party mismatch material cannot be sustained unless the assessee is supplied the relied upon particulars and given an effective opportunity to meet the case, including hearing and cross-examination where appropriate.