Section 174-A IPC proceedings cannot survive withdrawal of the underlying Section 138 NI Act complaint on compromise.

Proceedings under Section 174-A IPC arising from declaration of a person as proclaimed in a Section 138 NI Act complaint were treated as unsustainable once the underlying complaint was withdrawn on compromise. The Punjab & Haryana HC relied on co-ordinate Bench authority that, where the main NI Act proceedings stand withdrawn or otherwise regularised, continuation of the Section 174-A FIR serves no useful purpose and amounts to abuse of process. On that basis, the FIR and all consequential proceedings under Section 174-A IPC were quashed.

---

---

Issues: Whether proceedings under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and the consequential FIR were liable to be quashed after the underlying complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 had been withdrawn on compromise.

Analysis: The petition was founded on the premise that the FIR under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was registered only because the petitioner had been declared a proclaimed person in the complaint proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complaint itself had later been withdrawn pursuant to compromise between the parties. The Court relied on co-ordinate Bench decisions holding that where the main proceedings under the Negotiable Instruments Act stand withdrawn or are otherwise regularised, continuation of proceedings under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 amounts to abuse of the process of court.

Conclusion: The FIR and all consequential proceedings under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 were quashed.

---