Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was liable to be admitted for initiation of the corporate insolvency resolution process in view of the existence of financial debt, default, acknowledgment of liability, and completion of the application requirements.
Analysis: The record showed that the corporate debtor had availed loan facilities, had repeatedly acknowledged the debt in correspondence, and had also admitted liability in its reply. The debt exceeded the statutory threshold and default was established. The application was found to be complete, filed within limitation, and within the Tribunal's jurisdiction. The Tribunal therefore held that the ingredients for admission under Section 7 were satisfied. Consequent directions for moratorium and appointment of the proposed interim resolution professional were also issued.
Conclusion: The Section 7 application was admitted, CIRP was initiated, moratorium was imposed, and the proposed interim resolution professional was appointed.