Retrospective excise validation does not displace the limitation for short-levy recovery absent express exclusion.

Section 52 of the Finance Act, 1982 retrospectively validated the altered excise concession under Notification No. 99 of 1980, but it did not contain a non obstante clause or any express exclusion of Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The general limitation for short-levy demands therefore continued to apply, so recovery proceedings had to be initiated within the prescribed six-month period. Retrospective effect alone did not displace that statutory limitation, and the demand raised beyond time was invalid.

---

---

Issues: Whether the retrospective validation and recovery provision in Section 52 of the Finance Act, 1982 could override the six-month limitation prescribed for short-levy demands under Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.

Analysis: Section 52 retrospectively altered the concession available under Notification No. 99 of 1980 and authorised recovery of duties that would have been payable if the amended notification had been in force from 19 June 1980. However, the provision did not contain any non obstante clause and did not expressly exclude the operation of Section 11A. The general machinery for recovery of short-levied duty continued to be governed by Section 11A, and demands for such duty had still to be initiated within the prescribed period. The earlier Supreme Court ruling on a similar retrospective excise validation provision was applied as controlling authority for the proposition that retrospective effect does not, by itself, displace the limitation under Section 11A.

Conclusion: Section 52 of the Finance Act, 1982 does not override Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and the demand initiated beyond the six-month period was invalid; the assessee succeeds.

Ratio Decidendi: A retrospective validation or recovery provision in fiscal law remains subject to the general limitation provision for short-levy demands unless the legislature expressly excludes that limitation by clear words or a non obstante clause.

---