Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal decision: Section 14A disallowance, interest treatment, capital losses setoff upheld. Payments issue remanded.

        DCIT – CC-7 (3), Mumbai Versus Macrotech Developers Ltd (Successor to Bellissimo Crown Buildmart Pvt Ltd) (Earlier known as Lodha Crown Build Mart Ltd) And (Vice-Versa) And ACIT, CC-7 (3) Mumbai Versus Macrotech Developers Ltd (Earlier known as Lodha Developers Ltd) And Macrotech Developers Ltd (Earlier known as Lodha Developers Ltd) Versus DCIT – CC-7 (3), Mumbai

        DCIT – CC-7 (3), Mumbai Versus Macrotech Developers Ltd (Successor to Bellissimo Crown Buildmart Pvt Ltd) (Earlier known as Lodha Crown Build Mart Ltd) ... Issues Involved:
        1. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act.
        2. Capitalization of interest under Section 36(1)(iii).
        3. Setoff of carry-forward long-term capital losses.
        4. Payments/reimbursements to Lodha Developers UK Ltd.

        Detailed Analysis:

        1. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act:
        The primary issue was the disallowance of Rs. 1,68,56,525/- under Section 14A, being 0.5% of the average value of investment. The assessee contended that its own funds exceeded the investments capable of generating exempt income, thus no additional disallowance under Section 14A was warranted. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) computed disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) & (iii) of Rs. 20,47,49,126/-. The CIT(A) partially allowed the appeal, directing the A.O. to recompute the disallowance considering net interest debited to the profit and loss account. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, restricting disallowance to the extent of exempt income earned by the assessee, following the precedent set by the Hon'ble Tribunal in ACIT Vs Vireet Investments Pvt Ltd.

        2. Capitalization of Interest under Section 36(1)(iii):
        The A.O. disallowed the interest expenditure of Rs. 66,45,26,655/- claimed by the assessee under Section 36(1)(iii), treating it as capital expenditure. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, relying on the decision of the jurisdictional High Court in the case of Lokhandwala Constructions Ind Ltd. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the interest paid on loans obtained for stock-in-trade is an allowable deduction under Section 36(1)(iii), irrespective of whether the assessee follows the project completion method or percentage completion method.

        3. Setoff of Carry-Forward Long-Term Capital Losses:
        The A.O. denied the setoff of brought forward long-term capital losses against the capital gains of Rs. 11,11,89,976/-. The CIT(A) accepted the assessee's contentions and directed the A.O. to verify the assessment record and allow the setoff. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the directions were based on the Income Tax Settlement Commission's order and the factual matrix of the case.

        4. Payments/Reimbursements to Lodha Developers UK Ltd:
        The A.O. disallowed 50% of the payments/reimbursements amounting to Rs. 43,89,154/- due to insufficient evidence of services provided. The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance. The Tribunal, considering the additional evidence submitted by the assessee, restored the issue to the A.O. for verification and examination of the claim, directing the A.O. to grant relief based on the substantiated evidence.

        Conclusion:
        The Tribunal's judgment addressed multiple issues, providing clarity on the application of Section 14A, the treatment of interest under Section 36(1)(iii), the setoff of long-term capital losses, and the verification of payments to related entities. The decisions were grounded in legal precedents and factual examinations, ensuring a fair and just resolution of the disputes.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found