Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Scheme of Amalgamation Approved: Stakeholders' Interests Protected</h1> <h3>In Re : Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co. Ltd. and Jupiter Wagons Limited</h3> The Tribunal sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation between the petitioner Transferee Company and the Transferor Company, making it binding on all ... Sanction of scheme of amalgamation - Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013 - HELD THAT:- On perusal of the Scheme and the proceedings, it appears that the requirements of the provisions of section 230 and 232 are satisfied by the petitioner company. The proposed Scheme of Amalgamation is bona fide and in the interest of the shareholders and creditors. The scheme is sanctioned - application allowed. Issues Involved:1. Jurisdiction and applicability of Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013.2. Business operations and financial details of the petitioner and transferor companies.3. Rationale and benefits of the proposed scheme of amalgamation.4. Compliance with statutory requirements and regulatory observations.5. Approval process and stakeholder meetings.6. Final sanction and binding effect of the scheme.Detailed Analysis:1. Jurisdiction and Applicability of Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013:The petition was filed under Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013, seeking sanction for a scheme of amalgamation between the petitioner company (Transferee) and the Transferor Company. The Transferee Company is under the jurisdiction of the NCLT, Indore Bench, while the Transferor Company falls under the NCLT, Kolkata Bench.2. Business Operations and Financial Details:The petitioner company is engaged in metal fabrication, manufacturing, maintenance, and repair of commercial vehicles and railway wagons. The authorized share capital of the petitioner company is Rs. 470,05,00,000/-. The Transferor Company is involved in manufacturing, casting, forging, and maintenance of railway wagons and other related products. Its authorized share capital is Rs. 68,00,000/-.3. Rationale and Benefits of the Proposed Scheme of Amalgamation:The proposed amalgamation aims to create greater synergies between the companies, enhance net worth, and achieve cost savings through operational efficiencies. It is expected to improve competitive strength, productivity, and financial stability, benefiting stakeholders and shareholders. The amalgamation will also streamline operations and stabilize cash flow issues.4. Compliance with Statutory Requirements and Regulatory Observations:The petitioner company confirmed compliance with accounting standards and stated no pending proceedings or investigations under relevant sections of the Companies Act, 2013 and 1956. The Regional Director's report highlighted issues such as fees on enhanced authorized capital, SEBI circular compliance, foreign shareholding compliance with FEMA and RBI guidelines, and discrepancies in the number of secured creditors. The petitioner company responded to these observations, affirming compliance with statutory requirements and regulatory guidelines.5. Approval Process and Stakeholder Meetings:The Tribunal directed the convening of meetings for equity shareholders, secured creditors, and unsecured creditors, all of whom approved the scheme with significant majorities. Notices were issued to statutory authorities and published in newspapers, inviting objections. The Regional Director and ROC had no adverse observations, and the Income Tax Department confirmed no pending demands.6. Final Sanction and Binding Effect of the Scheme:The Tribunal found the scheme bona fide and in the interest of shareholders and creditors. The scheme was sanctioned, declaring it binding on the petitioner company, its shareholders, creditors, and all concerned. The Tribunal ordered the transfer of all properties, rights, liabilities, and duties of the Transferor Company to the Transferee Company. The order also directed the filing of the scheme with the Registrar of Companies and compliance with stamp duty adjudication.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the petition, sanctioning the scheme of amalgamation between the petitioner Transferee Company and the Transferor Company, making it binding on all stakeholders involved. The legal fees and expenses were quantified, and the petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found