Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (5) TMI 1029 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal overturns tax assessment for failure to follow procedure, emphasizes fairness and proper exercise of powers The Tribunal set aside the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax's order under section 263, finding that the revisionary powers were not properly ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Tribunal overturns tax assessment for failure to follow procedure, emphasizes fairness and proper exercise of powers

                            The Tribunal set aside the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax's order under section 263, finding that the revisionary powers were not properly exercised. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of compliance with show cause notice requirements and providing the assessee with a reasonable opportunity to respond. It concluded that the PCIT's shift in focus without clear findings and failure to give a proper hearing rendered the order unsustainable. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, highlighting the necessity of proper application of law in assessments and the limitations on revisionary powers.




                            Issues involved:
                            Delay in filing appeal, Additional grounds raised by the assessee, Validity of the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263 of the Act, Compliance with show cause notice requirements, Revisionary powers under section 263, Opportunity of being heard, Proper application of law in assessment, Sustainability of revisionary powers exercised by the Principal Commissioner.

                            Delay in filing appeal:
                            The appeal was filed with a delay of 86 days, and the assessee provided reasons for the delay, which were considered genuine, leading to the condonation of the delay.

                            Additional grounds raised by the assessee:
                            The assessee raised two sets of additional grounds, with the second ground questioning the legality of the revision order under section 263 of the Act. The Tribunal decided to take up the second additional ground as a preliminary issue, as it was a legal matter not requiring new facts.

                            Validity of the order under section 263:
                            The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) issued a show cause notice stating that the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue's interest. The PCIT directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to re-examine the issue of Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) without providing a clear finding on the error in the original assessment order. The Tribunal found that the PCIT's actions went beyond the scope of the show cause notice, leading to the order being set aside.

                            Compliance with show cause notice requirements:
                            The PCIT's order under section 263 was challenged for not providing a clear finding on the alleged errors in the assessment order. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity to respond to the specific grounds mentioned in the show cause notice.

                            Revisionary powers under section 263:
                            The Tribunal examined case laws cited by the parties, highlighting instances where revisionary powers were exercised based on specific grounds mentioned in the show cause notice. The Tribunal found that the PCIT's shift in focus from LTCG to business income without clear findings was not sustainable under section 263.

                            Opportunity of being heard:
                            The PCIT's order was scrutinized for not providing a proper opportunity for the assessee to address the issues raised in the show cause notice. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the PCIT to base their decisions on specific grounds communicated to the assessee.

                            Proper application of law in assessment:
                            The Tribunal analyzed the PCIT's directive to the AO to re-examine the LTCG issue, noting that the original assessment was made in accordance with the law. The Tribunal held that the PCIT's opinion on the adequacy of the AO's examination did not justify de novo assessment.

                            Sustainability of revisionary powers exercised by the Principal Commissioner:
                            After thorough examination of the facts and legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the PCIT's treatment of the assessment as erroneous and prejudicial to revenue was not justified under section 263. The order was set aside, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.

                            This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key issues involved, the arguments presented by both parties, and the Tribunal's reasoning in reaching its decision to set aside the PCIT's order under section 263 of the Act.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found