Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (5) TMI 736 - NAPA - GST

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cinema operator must refund Rs. 12,06,750 for not reducing ticket prices after GST rate cut under section 171 NAPA found cinema operator contravened section 171 of CGST Act by failing to reduce ticket prices commensurate with GST rate reduction from January 2019 ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Cinema operator must refund Rs. 12,06,750 for not reducing ticket prices after GST rate cut under section 171

                            NAPA found cinema operator contravened section 171 of CGST Act by failing to reduce ticket prices commensurate with GST rate reduction from January 2019 to January 2020. Authority determined total profiteering amount of Rs. 12,06,750 across different ticket categories. Respondent directed to reduce prices accordingly and deposit profiteered amount in Consumer Welfare Fund with 18% interest within three months. Penalty provisions under section 171(3A) applicable for violations post-January 2020, waivable if amount deposited within thirty days. Application disposed.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Allegation of profiteering by not passing on GST rate reduction benefits.
                            2. Investigation and findings by the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP).
                            3. Respondent's defense and submissions.
                            4. Determination of profiteered amount and directions for deposit.
                            5. Imposition of penalty and monitoring of compliance.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Allegation of Profiteering:
                            The Applicant No. 1 alleged that the Respondent did not pass on the benefit of the GST rate reduction on movie admission tickets from 28% to 18% and from 18% to 12% effective from 01.01.2019. Instead, the Respondent increased the base price to maintain the same cum-tax selling price.

                            2. Investigation and Findings by DGAP:
                            - The DGAP conducted a detailed investigation and found that the Respondent did not pass on the GST rate reduction benefits to the recipients by way of commensurate reduction in prices.
                            - The investigation covered the period from 01.01.2019 to 31.01.2020. The DGAP observed that the Respondent increased the base prices of tickets in various categories, resulting in profiteering.
                            - The DGAP's report included detailed tables (Table-A, Table-B, Table-C, and Table-D) illustrating the increased base prices and the resultant profiteering amounts.

                            3. Respondent's Defense and Submissions:
                            - The Respondent submitted that the Anti-profiteering Authority was constituted to check profiteering due to the advent of GST and not for subsequent rate reductions.
                            - The Respondent claimed that the entire profiteering amount was not solely his share and had been distributed among others.
                            - Despite disagreeing with the DGAP's findings, the Respondent agreed to deposit the alleged profiteered amount to avoid litigation and requested to pay it in installments without interest due to financial difficulties caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

                            4. Determination of Profiteered Amount and Directions for Deposit:
                            - The Authority determined that the Respondent did not reduce the base prices of tickets commensurately for the periods from 01.01.2019 to 18.07.2019 and from 19.07.2019 to 31.01.2020.
                            - The total profiteered amount was calculated as Rs. 12,06,750/-.
                            - The Respondent was directed to deposit the profiteered amount in the Consumer Welfare Fund of the Central and State Governments in the ratio of 50:50 along with 18% interest from the date of realization till the date of deposit, within three months from the date of the order.

                            5. Imposition of Penalty and Monitoring of Compliance:
                            - The Authority noted that the Respondent committed an offense under Section 171(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, and was liable for a penalty under Section 171(3A) for the amount collected after 01.01.2020.
                            - The Authority directed the concerned Commissioners of CGST/SGST to monitor the compliance of the order and ensure the deposit of the profiteered amount in the Consumer Welfare Funds.
                            - A compliance report was to be submitted within four months from the date of receipt of the order.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Authority concluded that the Respondent did not pass on the GST rate reduction benefits to the recipients, resulting in profiteering. The total profiteered amount was determined as Rs. 12,06,750/-, which the Respondent was directed to deposit along with interest. The Respondent was also held liable for a penalty for the amount collected after 01.01.2020. The concerned authorities were instructed to monitor compliance and submit a report.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found