Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition challenging the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme determination deserved interference despite the petitioner's delay, inaction, and failure to act within the scheme period.
Analysis: The petitioner had been informed of the estimated amount payable under the arrears category, but did not challenge the determination promptly and did not approach the Court within a reasonable time, even though the scheme remained open until 31 October 2020. The Court held that the petitioner showed no bona fides in seeking relief after substantial delay and that the belated approach defeated the claim for interference. The Court also noted that the delay and laches were fatal to the request for relief under the scheme.
Conclusion: The writ petition was not entertained and the challenge to the scheme determination failed.