Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit on outward GTA services for the period prior to 01.04.2008 was admissible, and whether the matter required remand for verification of compliance with the Board's prescribed conditions.
Analysis: Prior to 01.04.2008, the definition of input service referred to services used for removal of goods "from the place of removal", and the amendment from 01.04.2008 substituted that expression with "up to the place of removal". On that basis, outward transportation from the place of removal to the customer's premises was prima facie eligible for credit for the pre-amendment period. At the same time, the availability of credit was subject to satisfaction of the conditions prescribed in Board Circular No. 97/8/2007-ST dated 23.08.2007. Since the adjudicating authority had not verified whether those conditions were fulfilled, fresh examination was necessary.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit was prima facie admissible for the pre-01.04.2008 period, but the denial order could not be sustained without verification of the circular-based conditions; the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority.
Ratio Decidendi: For the period prior to 01.04.2008, outward GTA credit could be available when the transportation was from the place of removal, but entitlement remained subject to compliance with the conditions prescribed by the Board and required factual verification.