Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        2022 (5) TMI 207 - HC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        High Court rules on public funding in insolvency: MSEDCL's role, timely payments, and Committee of Creditors scrutiny The High Court deliberated on whether a public sector undertaking, specifically the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                            Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                                High Court rules on public funding in insolvency: MSEDCL's role, timely payments, and Committee of Creditors scrutiny

                                The High Court deliberated on whether a public sector undertaking, specifically the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), should fund the restructuring proposal of Lavasa Corporation Limited during the corporate insolvency resolution process. The Court highlighted concerns about using public funds and the role of the Committee of Creditors in deciding payments to MSEDCL. It emphasized the importance of timely payments to MSEDCL to avoid disruptions in power supply and directed the Committee of Creditors to reconsider their decision not to pay additional dues promptly. The Court allowed amending the petition to include the Committee of Creditors as a respondent for their involvement in the case.




                                Issues:
                                1. Whether a public sector undertaking should be made to fund the restructuring proposal of a company undergoing corporate insolvency resolution process.
                                2. Determining the payment of dues to the public sector undertaking for power supply.
                                3. The role of the Committee of Creditors (COC) in deciding the payment to the public sector undertaking.
                                4. Ensuring timely payment to the public sector undertaking to avoid adverse effects on power supply in the region.
                                5. Addressing the decision of the COC not to pay additional dues to the public sector undertaking and the need for reconsideration.
                                6. Amendment of the petition to include the Committee of Creditors as a respondent.

                                Analysis:

                                1. The High Court deliberated on whether a public sector undertaking, specifically the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), should be compelled to finance the restructuring proposal of Lavasa Corporation Limited during the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP). The Court raised concerns about the implications of using public funds for this purpose, particularly given MSEDCL's status as a State Government undertaking.

                                2. The Court examined the issue of payment of dues to MSEDCL for power supply, both pre and post the initiation of CIRP. While MSEDCL was being paid a partial amount to maintain power supply to Lavasa Corporation, uncertainties remained regarding the full settlement of outstanding bills. The Resolution Professional assured that MSEDCL would be paid its remaining dues on a priority basis under the resolution plan, although the exact timeline for payment was unclear.

                                3. The role of the Committee of Creditors (COC) in determining the payment to MSEDCL was a crucial aspect of the judgment. The Court highlighted that the COC, represented by its legal counsel, would primarily benefit from the sale proceeds of Lavasa Corporation, while expecting MSEDCL to continue supplying electricity on credit using public funds. This raised questions about fairness and the allocation of resources in the resolution process.

                                4. Recognizing the potential impact on power supply in Maharashtra if MSEDCL faced financial losses, the Court emphasized the importance of ensuring timely payment to MSEDCL to prevent disruptions in electricity provision to consumers. The Court suggested that the COC should prioritize settling MSEDCL's dues from the sale proceeds to mitigate any adverse effects on the public.

                                5. The Court addressed the decision of the COC not to pay additional dues to MSEDCL post the CIRP initiation. Despite the COC's stance during a meeting, the Court directed the COC to reconsider its decision and convene a meeting promptly to review the payment terms to MSEDCL. The Court emphasized the urgency of the matter and set a deadline for the COC to provide instructions.

                                6. Lastly, the Court allowed the amendment of the petition to include the Committee of Creditors as a respondent, acknowledging the importance of their involvement in the legal proceedings. The Court granted leave to amend the petition and instructed the necessary updates to be completed within a specified timeline to ensure all relevant parties were properly represented in the case.
                                Full Summary is available for active users!
                                Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                                Topics

                                ActsIncome Tax
                                No Records Found