Tribunal allows appeals on SAD receipts as income, pending AO verification. Tax income when it accrues.

The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee regarding the treatment of Special Additional Duty (SAD) receipts as income, subject to verification by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal emphasized that income should be taxed when it accrues, aligning with the principles set by the Supreme Court. The orders for the assessment years 2015-16 and 2016-17 were pronounced on 6th April 2022 in Chennai.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Treatment of Special Additional Duty (SAD) receipts as income on receipt basis.
2. Nature of SAD receipts as contingent receipts.
3. Taxability of SAD receipts based on the mercantile system of accounting.
4. Verification of SAD receipts by Customs Authorities.
5. Consistency in accounting treatment of SAD receipts.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Treatment of Special Additional Duty (SAD) receipts as income on receipt basis:
The core issue in the appeals was whether the SAD receipts should be treated as income on receipt basis. The Assessing Officer (AO) treated the SAD receipts as income for the year they accrued, while the assessee argued that these receipts were contingent and should be taxed in the year they were actually received and sanctioned by the Customs Department.

2. Nature of SAD receipts as contingent receipts:
The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 1,40,28,289/- for SAD receipts, arguing that these were contingent receipts pending verification by the Customs Authorities. The AO contended that since the assessee followed the mercantile system of accounting, the income should be recognized on accrual basis. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, stating that the SAD receipts should be considered income when accrued, not when received.

3. Taxability of SAD receipts based on the mercantile system of accounting:
The CIT(A) confirmed the AO’s view that under the mercantile system of accounting, income should be recognized when it accrues. The assessee argued that the SAD receipts were not accrued as they were contingent upon approval from the Customs Authorities, and hence should be taxed in the year of actual receipt.

4. Verification of SAD receipts by Customs Authorities:
The Tribunal noted that the SAD receipts were subject to verification and approval by the Customs Authorities. The assessee provided a Chartered Accountant's certificate showing the amounts excluded and included in the income computation for various years, indicating that the SAD receipts were offered for tax in subsequent years as and when they were verified and approved by the Customs Authorities.

5. Consistency in accounting treatment of SAD receipts:
The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's judgment in CIT vs. Excel Industries Ltd., which emphasized that income tax cannot be levied on hypothetical income and that income accrues when it becomes due and is accompanied by a corresponding liability of the other party to pay the amount. The Tribunal found the assessee's claim reasonable but subject to verification. It remanded the matter back to the AO to verify whether the SAD receipts were declared as income in subsequent years when they were approved by the Customs Authorities.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, subject to verification of facts by the AO. The AO was directed to verify whether the SAD receipts were approved by the Customs Authorities and included in the income of subsequent years. The Tribunal emphasized that income should be taxed when it accrues, accompanied by a corresponding liability to pay, aligning with the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Excel Industries Ltd.

Result:
Both appeals filed by the assessee for the assessment years 2015-16 and 2016-17 were allowed, subject to verification of facts by the AO. The order was pronounced on 6th April 2022 at Chennai.

---