Liquidator's claim assessment upheld where prior objections failed and belated claim admission was refused.

A liquidation claimant sought interference with the liquidator's assessment of claims, rejection of the admitted claims of others, and admission of his own belated claim. The Tribunal noted that similar objections had already been raised and dismissed in earlier proceedings, and that the liquidator had explained the basis of the claim assessment. It also relied on the applicant's status as a suspended director and shareholder, together with his lack of cooperation in the insolvency and liquidation process. On those facts, no basis was found to interfere with the liquidator's handling of claims or to grant the reliefs sought.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to interference with the liquidator's decision on claims and to admission of his own claim in the liquidation process.

Analysis: The applicant challenged the liquidator's treatment of claims in the liquidation proceedings and sought both rejection of the respondents' admitted claims and admission of his own belated claim. The order records that similar objections had already been raised in earlier proceedings and had been dismissed. It was also noted that the liquidator had explained the basis for the claim assessment and that the applicant, a suspended director and shareholder, had not cooperated in the insolvency and liquidation process. In these circumstances, the Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the liquidator's actions or to grant the reliefs sought.

Conclusion: The challenge to the liquidator's claim handling was rejected and the applicant was held not entitled to the reliefs sought.

---