TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the State could claim a first charge over the secured asset and obstruct registration of the sale deed executed pursuant to SARFAESI proceedings.
Analysis: The property had been sold as a secured asset under the SARFAESI Act after the borrower defaulted. The issue of priority between dues claimed under the VAT regime and the rights of the secured creditor over secured assets had already been settled by the Court, holding that the Bank's charge and statutory priority over secured assets prevail over the State's claim under section 48 of the GVAT Act. In that legal position, the State could not assert priority against the auction-purchased secured asset, and the Sub-Registrar had no basis to withhold registration of the sale deed executed by the Bank in favour of the purchaser.
Conclusion: The State could not claim first charge over the subject property, and the direction was warranted to register the sale deed in favour of the writ-applicant.
Final Conclusion: The tax recovery claim could not defeat the secured creditor's rights in the auctioned property, and the purchaser's title was entitled to be completed by registration.
Ratio Decidendi: Dues asserted under the VAT law do not displace the statutory priority of a secured creditor over secured assets sold under SARFAESI proceedings.
TaxTMI 
