Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on failure to receive an approved resolution plan and on the recommendation of the Committee of Creditors, liquidation of the corporate debtor should be ordered and a liquidator appointed.
Analysis: The application was supported by the resolution professional on the basis that the Committee of Creditors had unanimously resolved to liquidate the corporate debtor after no resolution plan was received within the CIRP period. The Adjudicating Authority noted that no resolution plan had been received under section 30(6) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and that the statutory conditions for liquidation under section 33(1)(b) stood satisfied. The order also provided for cessation of moratorium, vesting of powers in the liquidator, and conduct of liquidation in accordance with Chapter III of Part II of the Code and the Liquidation Process Regulations, including an endeavour to first sell the corporate debtor or its business as a going concern.
Conclusion: Liquidation was ordered and the liquidator was appointed.
Final Conclusion: The corporate insolvency process was brought to an end by liquidation, and the connected claims filed by operational creditors became infructuous.
Ratio Decidendi: Where no resolution plan is received and the Committee of Creditors resolves to liquidate, the Adjudicating Authority may order liquidation and appoint a liquidator under section 33 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.