Tribunal deletes late fees under section 234E, favoring assessee in tax assessment.

The appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal directed the deletion of late fees under section 234E for the relevant assessment years, following the decisions of Karnataka and Kerala High Courts. The Karnataka High Court held that the amendment to section 200A(1) was prospective, leading to the invalidation of the fee under section 234E for the period before 1st June 2015. The Tribunal adopted a construction favoring the assessee in tax provisions, resulting in the deletion of the late fees.

---

---

Issues:
- Whether fee under section 234E of the Act can be levied while processing of statements of tax deducted at source under section 200A(1) of the Act for the period prior to 1st June 2015.
- Whether clause (c) to section 200A sub-section (1) of the Act, as substituted by Finance Act, 2015, is retrospective in nature.

Analysis:
1. The appeals were filed against orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment years 2015-16 and 2016-17, involving the issue of levying fee under section 234E of the Act for late filing of TDS statements.
2. The appeals were heard together as they involved an identical issue. The assessee did not appear during the hearing, and the case proceeded based on submissions by the Departmental Representative and available records.
3. The main issue in the appeals was whether the fee under section 234E could be imposed for the period before 1st June 2015, and if the amendment to section 200A(1) by Finance Act, 2015, was retrospective.
4. The Karnataka High Court held that the amendment to section 200A(1) was prospective, while the Gujarat High Court viewed it as retrospective. The Kerala High Court agreed with the Karnataka High Court, declaring intimation under section 200A for fee under section 234E before 1st June 2015 as invalid.
5. The Tribunal, following the Karnataka High Court decision, directed the deletion of fees under section 234E for the period before 1st June 2015, considering the principle that a construction favoring the assessee must be adopted in tax provisions.
6. Consequently, the appeals by the assessee were allowed, and the late fees under section 234E for the relevant assessment years were directed to be deleted, based on the decisions of the Karnataka and Kerala High Courts.

This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key issues, arguments, and decisions made by various courts, leading to the final ruling in favor of the assessee based on the prospective nature of the amendment to section 200A(1) of the Act.

---