Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the faceless assessing officer's communication and earlier orders deserved to be withdrawn and whether the jurisdictional assessing officer should be given further time to decide the assessee's objections to reopening and assessment proceedings.
Analysis: The explanation filed on behalf of the faceless assessing officer was accepted, along with the apology tendered. The court also accepted the statement that the final assessment order would be passed only after the jurisdictional assessing officer disposed of the objections. The assessee's request for disposal of the interim application was also recorded. Further directions were issued that the jurisdictional assessing officer must consider all submissions, grant at least seven days' advance notice for personal hearing, furnish any judgment or order proposed to be relied upon, and pass a reasoned order dealing with all objections. Time for disposal of objections and completion of assessment was extended accordingly.
Conclusion: The interim application was disposed of, the assessee obtained the procedural relief sought, and the jurisdictional assessing officer was directed to decide the objections afresh in the manner directed by the court.