Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether compensation received on compulsory acquisition of land under the land acquisition regime was exempt from income tax and whether the addition sustained by the lower authorities was justified.
Analysis: The appeal turned on the applicability of the exemption under section 96 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The CBDT circular clarified that compensation received in respect of awards or agreements exempted under that provision would not be taxable under the Income-tax Act, 1961, and that no distinction was to be drawn between agricultural and non-agricultural land. The matter was treated as covered by an earlier order on identical facts, and the departmental representative did not dislodge that position.
Conclusion: The compensation received for compulsory acquisition was held exempt from income tax, and the addition made by the Assessing Officer and sustained by the Commissioner (Appeals) was not justified.