Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transfer of the right to use the trade mark to a related party for a nominal consideration within the look-back period constituted an undervalued transaction liable to be avoided and reversed, with the trade mark to be vested back in the corporate debtor.
Analysis: The transfer followed a partnership arrangement and was effected shortly thereafter for Rs. 10 lakhs for 15 years, notwithstanding the asserted value of the trade mark and the surrounding circumstances showing a change in control and benefit to the transferee. The transaction was entered into within the relevant period, involved a related party, and was not shown to have been in the ordinary course of business. In such circumstances, the ingredients for an undervalued transaction were treated as satisfied, and the relief under the avoidance provisions was considered appropriate to secure implementation of the resolution process.
Conclusion: The transaction was held to be avoidable as an undervalued transaction, and the right to use the trade mark was withdrawn and vested back in the corporate debtor.
Ratio Decidendi: A transfer of a corporate debtor's asset or commercial right to a related party for significantly less consideration within the relevant period, without proof that it occurred in the ordinary course of business, may be avoided and reversed under the insolvency avoidance provisions.