Staff insurance for statutory compliance qualifies as input service where it is not for employees' personal use or consumption.

Staff insurance taken by an employer to comply with a statutory obligation and support employee welfare is not covered by the Rule 2(l) exclusion for services used primarily for the personal use or consumption of employees. Where the insurance is connected with employer liability and legal compliance, and not shown to be for individual employees' personal benefit, it qualifies as an input service for Cenvat credit. On that basis, the document states that such staff insurance services remain eligible for credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

---

---

Issues: Whether staff insurance services availed for employees are eligible input services for Cenvat credit, or fall within the exclusion for services used primarily for personal use or consumption of employees.

Analysis: The exclusion in Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 applies only where the service is used primarily for the personal use or consumption of an employee. The insurance was taken by the assessee in discharge of a statutory obligation connected with employee welfare and employer liability, and there was nothing to show that it was obtained for the personal benefit of individual employees. The authority relied on the statutory framework and prior precedent holding that such insurance, when taken to satisfy a legal mandate and not for personal consumption, does not fall within the exclusion clause.

Conclusion: Staff insurance services availed under statutory mandate were held to be eligible input services, and Cenvat credit was allowed in favour of the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: Insurance services obtained by an employer to satisfy a statutory obligation and not for the personal use or consumption of employees are not excluded from the definition of input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

---