Appeal partly allowed, challenge rejection affirmed. Court directs document review, sets timeline for response.

The appeal was partly allowed, affirming the rejection of the challenge to the show cause notice. The Court directed the perusal of documents by the appellants' representative and outlined a timeline for response and adjudication, emphasizing the importance of natural justice in the process.

---

---

Issues:
1. Challenge to the order dated 28th January, 2022 and the show cause notice dated 4th September, 2017.
2. Interpretation of Rule 24A of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 regarding return of records.
3. Applicability of the extended period of limitation under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
4. Request for the return of documents seized during search and seizure operations.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Challenge to the order and show cause notice
The appellants filed a writ petition seeking to quash the order dated 28th January, 2022, and the show cause notice dated 4th September, 2017. The Writ Court dismissed the petition, leading to the appeal. The appellants argued that the documents seized during search operations were not returned as per Rule 24A, affecting their ability to respond effectively to the show cause notice. The Court affirmed the rejection of the challenge to the show cause notice.

Issue 2: Interpretation of Rule 24A
Rule 24A of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 requires the return of non-relied upon documents within 30 days of the show cause notice issuance. The appellants contended that the documents were not returned, hindering their response. The Court noted that the order was passed in accordance with previous directions, making the time limit irrelevant. The Court emphasized that the documents need not be returned before adjudication begins.

Issue 3: Extended period of limitation
The question of invoking the extended period of limitation under Section 11A was considered a mixed question of law and fact. The appellants' ability to respond effectively to the show cause notice was highlighted. The Court emphasized the need for the appellants to have an opportunity to examine the documents before responding but clarified that this did not automatically entitle them to the return of the documents.

Issue 4: Request for return of documents
The Court partially allowed the appeal, directing the second respondent to allow the appellants' representative to peruse and take copies of relevant documents mentioned in the show cause notice. The appellants were granted time to respond after perusal. The adjudication process was to be completed within 45 days of receiving the reply, ensuring the principles of natural justice were upheld.

In conclusion, the appeal was partly allowed, affirming the rejection of the challenge to the show cause notice. The Court directed the perusal of documents by the appellants' representative and outlined a timeline for response and adjudication, emphasizing the importance of natural justice in the process.

---