Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (3) TMI 529 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Upholds CIT(A)'s Decision on Depreciation & Expenses for Building Block C The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision to allow depreciation, interest expenses, and administrative expenses for ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Tribunal Upholds CIT(A)'s Decision on Depreciation & Expenses for Building Block C

                            The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision to allow depreciation, interest expenses, and administrative expenses for Building Block C. The Tribunal emphasized the principle of consistency, stating that once an asset is deemed ready to use and expenses are allowed in a previous assessment year, the Assessing Officer cannot disallow them in subsequent years without valid reasons or changes in circumstances. The Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue's arguments and upheld the previous decisions regarding the disallowance of depreciation and expenses for Building Block C.




                            Issues:
                            Disallowance of depreciation for building Block C
                            Disallowance of interest expenses for building Block C
                            Disallowance of administrative expenses
                            Consistency in allowing depreciation and expenses
                            Assessment of asset "put to use" for depreciation

                            Analysis:
                            1. Disallowance of Depreciation for Building Block C:
                            The appeal by the Revenue challenged the deletion of depreciation disallowance amounting to Rs. 9,97,11,787 for building Block C by the CIT(A). The Revenue contended that the building was not completed for lease out as certain amenities were not finished, thus claiming it was not put to use. However, the assessee argued that since Block C was deemed complete and added to the block of assets in the preceding assessment year, the Assessing Officer cannot retract to disallow depreciation. The principle of consistency was emphasized, supported by legal precedents, asserting the eligibility to claim depreciation for an asset ready to use but not actually used. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing that the Assessing Officer cannot change their opinion without any change in facts and circumstances.

                            2. Disallowance of Interest Expenses for Building Block C:
                            The Revenue also contested the deletion of interest expenses disallowance amounting to Rs. 20,05,29,277 for building Block C. The Revenue argued that since the asset was not put to use, depreciation and interest expenses should not be allowed. However, the assessee maintained that interest expenditure was claimed only for Block C, which was allowed in the previous assessment year. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing the principle of consistency and the acceptance of Block C being put to use in the preceding year.

                            3. Disallowance of Administrative Expenses:
                            The Revenue challenged the deletion of administrative expenses disallowance of Rs. 92,98,042 by the CIT(A), claiming that no business was conducted during the year. The assessee argued that administrative expenses were attributable to Block C only, which were allowed in the previous assessment year. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, citing the principle of consistency and relying on legal precedents to support the allowance of administrative expenses.

                            4. Consistency in Allowing Depreciation and Expenses:
                            The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in allowing depreciation and expenses, especially when the Assessing Officer had accepted the asset as ready to use in the preceding assessment year. It was held that the Assessing Officer cannot change their stance without any change in facts or circumstances.

                            5. Assessment of Asset "Put to Use" for Depreciation:
                            The Tribunal reiterated that once an asset is deemed ready to use and depreciation is allowed in a previous assessment year, the Assessing Officer cannot disallow it in the subsequent year without valid reasons or changes in the situation. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to allow depreciation, interest expenses, and administrative expenses for Block C, as the Department had accepted its status as "put to use" in the previous assessment year.

                            In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s order as it found no merit in the Revenue's contentions, emphasizing the principle of consistency and the acceptance of Block C being "put to use" in the preceding assessment year.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found