Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal Upholds Liquidator's Actions in Property Purchase Case</h1> <h3>Zio Homes Pvt. Ltd. Versus Amit Shah, Liquidator of Biodiversity Conservation (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.</h3> The Tribunal dismissed the applications filed by M/s. Zio Homes Private Limited, refusing the extension of time for completing the purchase of a property ... Seeking extension of time to the Applicant for completing the purchase under the LOI until such time the disputes in connection with the Disputed Extent are resolved and attained finality - waiver of interest purported to be imposed on the Applicant for any delay on payment of the balance consideration - whether the Liquidator was entitled to issue a letter of intent only for an extent of 45.21 Acres as against the total extent of 47.99 Acres as described in EOI process memorandum and all other subsequent correspondence? - HELD THAT:- On perusal of Various terms and clauses of the EOI process memorandum and other consequential documents and also the applicable provisions of the Code and Regulations made thereunder and accordingly there is no merit in both the Applications and that the Liquidator is fully empowered to issue the LOI to the part extent i.e., for 45.21 Acres forming part of the total extent of 47.99 Acres of the property. The Applicant failed to show any clause or term from any of the EOI Process memorandum or any provisions or Regulations of the IBC, which prohibits the Liquidator from issuing a LOI for an extent less than the extent shown in the EOI. Application dismissed. Issues:1. Extension of time for completing purchase under LOI2. Waiver of interest on delay in payment3. Other orders in the interest of justiceExtension of Time for Completing Purchase under LOI:The case involved M/s. Zio Homes Private Limited seeking an extension to complete the purchase of a property after being declared the successful bidder in an e-auction. The Applicant filed I.A. No. 83/2021 requesting time extension until resolution of disputes over the Disputed Extent of land. The Tribunal examined the circumstances, including the issuance of a Letter of Intent (LOI) only for a portion of the total land, and concluded that the Liquidator was empowered to issue the LOI for a part extent, dismissing the Applicant's plea for extension.Waiver of Interest on Delay in Payment:Additionally, M/s. Zio Homes Private Limited sought the waiver of interest purportedly imposed for any delay in payment of the balance consideration. The Tribunal scrutinized the terms of the EOI process memorandum, e-auction terms, and relevant regulations. It was determined that there was no illegality or arbitrariness in the Liquidator's actions, including directing the Applicant to accept the LOI unconditionally. The Tribunal found no merit in the Applicant's plea for interest waiver.Other Orders in the Interest of Justice:Furthermore, the Applicant filed I.A. No. 216/2021 seeking various directions, including acting on the confirmation of Expression of Interest auction price for the entire extent of the property. The Tribunal deliberated on the applicable provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and related regulations. It was held that the Liquidator was within rights to issue the LOI for a lesser extent than initially described in the EOI process memorandum. Consequently, both I.A.'s were dismissed as the Tribunal found no merit in the Applicant's contentions.In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed both applications, emphasizing that the Liquidator had acted within legal boundaries in issuing the LOI for a reduced extent of the property. The judgment underscored the importance of adhering to the terms outlined in the EOI process memorandum and relevant regulations, ultimately upholding the actions of the Liquidator in the e-auction process.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found