Drilling and blasting for boulder extraction qualifies as works contract under Entry 3(x) but loses concessional GST rate post-amendment AAR Maharashtra ruled that drilling and blasting operations with explosives for boulder extraction constitutes a composite supply of works contract. The ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Drilling and blasting for boulder extraction qualifies as works contract under Entry 3(x) but loses concessional GST rate post-amendment
AAR Maharashtra ruled that drilling and blasting operations with explosives for boulder extraction constitutes a composite supply of works contract. The applicant, as sub-contractor, qualified for 5% GST rate under Entry 3(x) of Notification 11/2017-CT(R) when main contractor provided services to government entities. However, following amendment via Notification 15/2021-CT(R) effective January 1, 2022, which deleted "Governmental Authority" and "Government Entity" from Entry 3(vii), the applicant's services no longer qualify for the concessional rate under Entry 3(x).
Issues Involved: 1. Classification of the activity as supply of goods, services, or a composite supply of 'works contract'. 2. Applicability of Entry 3(x) of Notification No. 11/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 for the activity carried out by the applicant.
Detailed Analysis:
Issue 1: Classification of the Activity Relevant Facts: - The applicant, M/s Kapil Sons Explosives LLP, is engaged in drilling and blasting works using industrial explosives. - The main contractor, M/s Balajee Infratech & Constructions Pvt Ltd, has been awarded a contract by CIDCO for land development, including drilling, blasting, and reclamation works. - The applicant is subcontracted to provide drilling and blasting operations with explosives for extracting boulders at the designated site.
Applicant's Interpretation: - The applicant argues that the activity involves both goods (explosives) and services (drilling and blasting), thus constituting a composite supply. - The term "works contract" under Section 2(119) of the CGST Act includes activities involving immovable property and transfer of property in goods in some form.
Authority's Findings: - The activity performed by the applicant is a composite supply as defined under GST laws. - Reference is made to the decision in M/s KHEDUT HAT [2018-TIOL-173-AAR-GST], which held that blasting work with the use of explosives is a composite supply. - The activity involves immovable property (airport land), thus classifying it as a composite supply of works contract.
Conclusion: - The activity carried out by the applicant is classified as a composite supply of 'works contract'.
Issue 2: Applicability of Entry 3(x) of Notification No. 11/2017-CT (Rate) Relevant Facts: - The main contractor, M/s Balajee, is providing services to CIDCO, a governmental authority, predominantly involving earthwork constituting more than 75% of the value of the works contract. - The applicant contends that their subcontracted services should be classified under Entry 3(x) of the Notification, which allows for a 5% GST rate.
Applicant's Interpretation: - The applicant argues that since the main contractor’s services are classified under Entry 3(vii), their subcontracted services should fall under Entry 3(x), thus qualifying for the reduced tax rate. - The applicant provides evidence that the main contractor’s work involves predominantly earthwork and is billed under HSN Code 9954 at a 5% GST rate.
Jurisdictional Officer's Submissions: - The officer agrees that the applicant’s activity is a composite supply of works contract but contends that it does not predominantly involve earthwork. - The officer argues that the applicant’s activity should be categorized under Entry 3(xii) of the Notification, which is taxed at 18%.
Authority's Findings: - The authority agrees that the applicant’s work is a composite supply of works contract. - The authority examines whether the subcontracted work falls under Entry 3(x), which depends on the classification of the main contractor’s services under Entry 3(vii). - The authority acknowledges that the main contractor’s work is predominantly earthwork and qualifies for the reduced tax rate. - However, the Notification No. 15/2021-CT(R) dated 18.11.2021, effective from 01.01.2022, excludes “Governmental Authority” and “Government Entity” from Entry 3(vii).
Conclusion: - Before 01.01.2022, the applicant’s services would qualify under Entry 3(x) and be taxed at 5% if the main contractor’s services fall under Entry 3(vii). - From 01.01.2022, due to the amendment in the Notification, the applicant’s services do not qualify under Entry 3(x).
Final Order: 1. The activity carried out by the applicant is classified as a composite supply of 'works contract'. 2. The activity does not qualify for classification under Entry 3(x) of Notification No. 11/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 for the reduced tax rate of 5%.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.