2022 (2) TMI 979 - AT - Income Tax

Tribunal allows appeal on disallowed charges & emphasizes documentation importance

Maharashtra Seamless Ltd. Versus DCIT, Circle-6 (1) New Delhi

The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal against the disallowances of legal and professional charges under section 40(a)(i) and ... TDS u/s 195 - Addition u/s 40(a)(i) - legal and professional charges - disallowance has been confirmed holding the payment to be fee for technical services - Scope of provision of section 9 as well as that of the DTAA between India and USA - HELD THAT:- As submitted before us that these payments are not chargeable to tax and filed all the supporting evidences with respect to such payments before the AO and the same are also placed in the paper book. Copy of certificate given by a Chartered Accountant in form no. 15CB along with the information by the assessee in form no. 15CA as required to be filed before making any foreign currency remittance were furnished before the Assessing Officer and are also placed in the paper book. As submitted that one payment has been made to subscribe for information online for Iron & Steel prices from China. The subscription was paid earlier for two years. It is a renewal of subscription and claimed in the A.Y. 2009-10 and A.Y. 2010-11 which was accepted by the revenue. The copy of the party's invoice and payment advice of HDFC bank have been perused. On examination of the facts and evidences before us, we hold that this cannot be treated u/s. 40(a)(ia). With regard to reimbursement of travelling expenses from the Germany based company, the accounts have been reimbursed by the vendor in connection with the visit of the employees with regard to examination of the shipment consisting of rolled coils, non-alloy steel rolls at supplier's premises. CIT(A) held that the amounts have been reimbursed in connection with examination of quality, quantity and weight whether in conformity with the contract or invoice and held that such inspection and examination services are technical services provided. The total amount thus reimbursed - We find that the inspection and examination of the goods before shipment is a common practice and it cannot be treated as a technical service. The inspection with regard to quality, quantity and weight of the product pre-shipment of rolling coils, non-alloy steel rolls cannot be treated as technical and managerial services as per the provisions of the DTAA and Section 9(1) - we hold that decision of the ld. CIT(A) cannot be affirmed on this ground. Disallowance u/s. 14A - HELD THAT:- The assessee company has not earned any exempt income during the year under reference hence keeping in view the judgment in the case Cheminvest Ltd. [2015 (9) TMI 238 - DELHI HIGH COURT] no disallowance is called for u/s. 14A Issues:1. Disallowance of legal and professional charges under section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act.2. Disallowance of an amount under section 14A of the Income Tax Act.Issue 1: Disallowance of legal and professional charges under section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act:The assessee did not deduct TDS on payments made to entities in foreign currency, leading the AO to treat these payments as managerial and technical services under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Act. The assessee provided evidence to support these payments, including certificates and payment details. The Tribunal found that certain payments, like a subscription for information online, were not subject to disallowance under section 40(a)(ia). Additionally, reimbursement of travelling expenses from a Germany-based company was considered as payment for inspection and examination services. However, the Tribunal disagreed with the CIT(A)'s characterization of these services as technical, holding that pre-shipment inspections are not technical or managerial services. Consequently, the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was not upheld.Issue 2: Disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act:The assessee did not earn any exempt income during the relevant year, leading the Tribunal to rely on the judgment in Cheminvest Ltd. Vs. ITO (Delhi HC) to conclude that no disallowance was warranted under section 14A of the Income Tax Act. As a result, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the disallowance under section 14A was set aside.In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal against the disallowances of legal and professional charges under section 40(a)(i) and the amount under section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The decision highlighted the importance of providing proper documentation and analysis to support expenses and income, ultimately influencing the outcome of the case.