Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 10B could be disallowed for want of the particular approval insisted upon by the Revenue, when the claim had been accepted in the initial year and in subsequent years, and the Tribunal had followed its earlier view on the same issue.
Analysis: The appeal turned on the treatment of the Section 10B claim. The earlier dismissal of a connected tax appeal had proceeded on the footing that once the Revenue had ed the certification and allowed the deduction in the initial year and thereafter in subsequent years, it was not open to take a different stand for one isolated year without any explanation. The Tribunal had followed that approach. The remaining questions raised by the Revenue were not examined and were kept open. The Court declined to enter into the broader controversy regarding the effect of approval by the STP authority.
Conclusion: The Tribunal's view allowing the assessee's Section 10B claim was upheld, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was dismissed, leaving the assessee's entitlement to the deduction intact on the basis of consistency in treatment across the relevant years.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the Revenue has ed a deduction claim in the initial and subsequent years of a continuing statutory period, it cannot pick out a single year for different treatment on the same facts without a cogent explanation.