TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Dispute Over Sale Transaction: Emergency Arbitrator Injunction</h1> The case involved a dispute over a sale transaction leading to arbitration before SIAC. The Emergency Arbitrator issued an injunction, enforced by Delhi ... Application for emergency relief with the registrar of the SIAC court of arbitration seeking interim prohibitory injunction to prevent FRL and FCPL from taking further steps in the aforesaid transaction with the Reliance group - tortious interference in the scheme for the sale of assets - HELD THAT:- If an order is passed, by the Arbitral Tribunal, in favour of FRL, then it will be difficult to initiate fresh proceedings before NCLT at that stage. It is his submission that FRL is incurring expenditure everyday and there is an imminent threat of insolvency. Any delay in the proceedings before the NCLT will have serious ramifications and virtually render the agreement between FRLReliance group redundant. Furthermore, the livelihood of 22,000 employees of FRL are also at stake. In the same breath, he has submitted that continuation of the NCLT proceedings will not adversely affect Amazon in any manner. Liberty granted to FRL to approach the High Court by filing an application seeking continuation of the NCLT proceedings beyond the 8th Stage (Meeting of Shareholders and creditors) - appeal disposed off. Issues involved:1. Enforcement of Emergency Arbitrator award and subsequent legal proceedings.2. Challenges to the Emergency Arbitrator's award before the Arbitral Tribunal and the Delhi High Court.3. Consideration of NCLT proceedings and regulatory approvals in light of the legal disputes.4. Request for continuation of NCLT proceedings beyond a specific stage.Enforcement of Emergency Arbitrator award and subsequent legal proceedings:The case involved a dispute arising from a sale transaction between two parties, leading to arbitration proceedings initiated by one party before the Singapore International Arbitration Center (SIAC). The Emergency Arbitrator issued an injunction against one party, preventing further steps in the transaction. Subsequently, legal actions were taken before the Delhi High Court, where orders were passed enforcing the Emergency Arbitrator award. The matter was brought before the Supreme Court, which allowed certain proceedings to continue without a final order. The Supreme Court did not delve into the case's merits but focused on procedural aspects regarding the maintainability of appeals against the enforcement orders.Challenges to the Emergency Arbitrator's award before the Arbitral Tribunal and the Delhi High Court:Following the Emergency Arbitrator's award, the parties sought to challenge it before the Arbitral Tribunal and the Delhi High Court. The Arbitral Tribunal dismissed the applications to vacate the award, leading to further legal challenges before the Delhi High Court. The Supreme Court, in a detailed order, granted leave and set aside previous orders, directing the Single Judge to reconsider the issues independently. The parties were given the opportunity to present their arguments, with the Court emphasizing the need for a fair and unbiased reconsideration of the matters at hand.Consideration of NCLT proceedings and regulatory approvals in light of the legal disputes:The legal disputes had implications on the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) proceedings and regulatory approvals required for the transaction. The parties presented arguments regarding the progression of NCLT proceedings and the potential impact on the final approval of the scheme. Concerns were raised about compliance with the Emergency Arbitrator's order and the Enforcement order, highlighting the need for a balanced approach that considers all legal aspects and implications on the transaction's completion.Request for continuation of NCLT proceedings beyond a specific stage:In light of the ongoing legal battles and the progression of NCLT proceedings, one party requested the High Court to allow continuation beyond a specific stage of the NCLT process. Arguments were presented regarding the time required to complete the necessary steps for final approval and the potential consequences of delays on the parties involved. The Supreme Court granted liberty to approach the High Court for the continuation of NCLT proceedings beyond the specified stage, emphasizing the need for expeditious consideration and resolution of the matter to mitigate adverse effects on the parties and stakeholders involved.This detailed analysis outlines the complex legal proceedings surrounding the enforcement of an Emergency Arbitrator award, challenges before different judicial bodies, considerations regarding NCLT proceedings, and the request for continuation of proceedings beyond a specific stage, reflecting the intricate legal landscape and the need for a fair and efficient resolution of the disputes.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
